Efficient uniform designs for multi-wave computer experiments

Daniel Williamson; Ian Vernon

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1309.3520

Efficient uniform designs for multi-wave computer experiments

Daniel Williamson·Ian Vernon

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this paper we tackle the problem of generating uniform designs in very small subregions of computer model input space that have been identified in previous experiments as worthy of further study. The method is capable of producing uniform designs in subregions of computer model input space defined by a membership function that consists of a continuous function passing a threshold test, and does so far more efficiently than current methods when these subregions are small. Our application is designing for regions of input space that are not ruled out by history matching, a statistical methodology applied in numerous diverse scientific applications whereby model runs are used to cut out regions of input space that are incompatible with real world observations. History matching defines a membership function for a region of input space that is not ruled out yet by observations in the form of a distance metric called implausibility. We use this distance metric to drive a new type of Evolutionary Monte Carlo algorithm with a uniform distribution on the not ruled out yet region as its target distribution. The algorithm can locate and generate uniform points within extremely small subspaces of the computer model input space with complex and even disconnected topologies. We illustrate the performance of the technique in comparison to current methods with a number of idealised examples. We then apply our algorithm to generating an optimal design for the not ruled out yet region of a galaxy simulation model called GALFORM following 4 previous waves of history matching where the target region is 0.001% the volume of the input space.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Daniel Williamson, Ian Vernon. 2013-09-13. Efficient uniform designs for multi-wave computer experiments. https://arxiv.org/abs/1309.3520

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME↗