Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1309.3849

Efficient Graph Algorithms for Network Analysis

Tong-Wook Shinn·Tadao Takaoka
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The GC problem is to identify a pre-determined number of center vertices such that the distances or costs from (or to) the centers to (or from) other vertices is minimized. The bottleneck of a path is the minimum capacity of edges on the path. The Bottleneck Paths (BP) problem is to compute the paths that give us the maximum bottleneck values between pairs of vertices. The Graph Bottleneck (GB) problem is to find the minimum bottleneck value out of bottleneck paths for all possible pairs of vertices. We give two similar algorithms that are based on binary search to solve the 1-center GC problem and the GB problem on directed graphs with unit edge costs. We achieve $\tilde{O}(n^{2.373})$ worst case time complexity for both the 1-center GC problem and the GB problem, where $n$ is the number of vertices in the graph. This is better than the straightforward methods of solving the two problems in $O(n^{2.575})$ and $O(n^{2.688})$ time bounds, respectively. We then combine the Bottleneck Paths (BP) problem with the well known Shortest Paths (SP) problem to compute the shortest paths for all possible flow values. We call this problem the Shortest Paths for All Flows (SP-AF) problem. We show that if the flow demand is uncertain, but between two consecutive capacity values, the unique shortest path can be computed to push that flow. If the uncertainty stretches over two intervals, we need to prepare two shortest paths to accommodate the uncertainty, etc. In introducing this new problem, we define a new semi-ring called the distance/flow semi-ring, and show that the well known algorithm by Floyd can be used over the distance/flow semi-ring to solve the All Pairs Shortest Paths for All Flows (APSP-AF) problem.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Tong-Wook Shinn, Tadao Takaoka. 2013-09-16. Efficient Graph Algorithms for Network Analysis. https://arxiv.org/abs/1309.3849

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗