SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1309.7141

A general method for common intervals

Abstract

Given an elementary chain of vertex set V, seen as a labelling of V by the set {1, ...,n=|V|}, and another discrete structure over $V$, say a graph G, the problem of common intervals is to compute the induced subgraphs G[I], such that $I$ is an interval of [1, n] and G[I] satisfies some property Pi (as for example Pi= "being connected"). This kind of problems comes from comparative genomic in bioinformatics, mainly when the graph $G$ is a chain or a tree (Heber and Stoye 2001, Heber and Savage 2005, Bergeron et al 2008). When the family of intervals is closed under intersection, we present here the combination of two approaches, namely the idea of potential beginning developed in Uno, Yagiura 2000 and Bui-Xuan et al 2005 and the notion of generator as defined in Bergeron et al 2008. This yields a very simple generic algorithm to compute all common intervals, which gives optimal algorithms in various applications. For example in the case where $G$ is a tree, our framework yields the first linear time algorithms for the two properties: "being connected" and "being a path". In the case where $G$ is a chain, the problem is known as: common intervals of two permutations (Uno and Yagiura 2000), our algorithm provides not only the set of all common intervals but also with some easy modifications a tree structure that represents this set.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ismael Belghiti, Michel Habib. 2013-09-27. A general method for common intervals. https://arxiv.org/abs/1309.7141

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS