SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1310.1649

QuickLexSort: An efficient algorithm for lexicographically sorting nested restrictions of a database

Abstract

Lexicographical sorting is a fundamental problem with applications to contingency tables, databases, Bayesian networks, and more. A standard method to lexicographically sort general data is to iteratively use a stable sort -- a sort which preserves existing orders. Here we present a new method of lexicographical sorting called QuickLexSort. Whereas a stable sort based lexicographical sorting algorithm operates from the least important to most important features, in contrast, QuickLexSort sorts from the most important to least important features, refining the sort as it goes. QuickLexSort first requires a one-time modest pre-processing step where each feature of the data set is sorted independently. When lexicographically sorting a database, QuickLexSort (including pre-processing) has comparable running time to using a stable sort based approach. For a data base with $m$ rows and $n$ columns, and a sorting algorithm running in time $O(mlog(m))$, a stable sort based lexicographical sort and QuickLexSort will both take time $O(nmlog(m))$. However in many applications one has the need to lexicographically sort nested data, e.g.\ all possible sub-matrices up to a certain cardinality of columns. In such cases we show QuickLexSort gives a performance improvement of a log factor of the database length (rows in matrix) over using a standard stable sort based approach. E.g.\ to sort all sub-matrices up to cardinality $k$, QuickLexSort has running time $O(mn^k)$ whereas a stable sort based lexicographical sort will take time $O(mlog(m)n^k)$. After the pre-processing step that is run only once for the entire matrix, QuickLexSort has a running time linear in the number of nested sub-matrices to sort. We conclude with an application to Bayesian network scoring to detect epistasis using SNP marker data.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

David Haws. 2013-10-06. QuickLexSort: An efficient algorithm for lexicographically sorting nested restrictions of a database. https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.1649

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS