Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1310.4716

SOSTOOLS Version 4.00 Sum of Squares Optimization Toolbox for MATLAB

Antonis Papachristodoulou·James Anderson·Giorgio Valmorbida·Stephen Prajna·Pete Seiler·Pablo Parrilo·Matthew M. Peet·Declan Jagt
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The release of SOSTOOLS v4.00 comes as we approach the 20th anniversary of the original release of SOSTOOLS v1.00 back in April, 2002. SOSTOOLS was originally envisioned as a flexible tool for parsing and solving polynomial optimization problems, using the SOS tightening of polynomial positivity constraints, and capable of adapting to the ever-evolving fauna of applications of SOS. There are now a variety of SOS programming parsers beyond SOSTOOLS, including YALMIP, Gloptipoly, SumOfSquares, and others. We hope SOSTOOLS remains the most intuitive, robust and adaptable toolbox for SOS programming. Recent progress in Semidefinite programming has opened up new possibilities for solving large Sum of Squares programming problems, and we hope the next decade will be one where SOS methods will find wide application in different areas. In SOSTOOLS v4.00, we implement a parsing approach that reduces the computational and memory requirements of the parser below that of the SDP solver itself. We have re-developed the internal structure of our polynomial decision variables. Specifically, polynomial and SOS variable declarations made using sossosvar, sospolyvar, sosmatrixvar, etc now return a new polynomial structure, dpvar. This new polynomial structure, is documented in the enclosed dpvar guide, and isolates the scalar SDP decision variables in the SOS program from the independent variables used to construct the SOS program. As a result, the complexity of the parser scales almost linearly in the number of decision variables. As a result of these changes, almost all users will notice a significant increase in speed, with large-scaleproblems experiencing the most dramatic speedups. Parsing time is now always less than 10% of time spent in the SDP solver. Finally, SOSTOOLS now provides support for the MOSEK solver interface as well as the SeDuMi, SDPT3, CSDP, SDPNAL, SDPNAL+, and SDPA solvers.

Explore related subjects

math.OCcs.MScs.SYeess.SY

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Antonis Papachristodoulou, James Anderson, Giorgio Valmorbida, Stephen Prajna, Pete Seiler, Pablo Parrilo, Matthew M. Peet, Declan Jagt. 2013-10-17. SOSTOOLS Version 4.00 Sum of Squares Optimization Toolbox for MATLAB. https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.4716

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Deterministic and Random Bipartite Matching on General Networks: Convex Flow Reformulation, Asymptotic Properties, and Fast Algorithms

Minimum-distance bipartite matching on general networks has numerous applications various fields. This paper first focuses on deterministic problems and presents an exact edgewise-separable convex-flow reformulation. By introducing a smooth monotone rearrangement approximation of the edge-wise imbalance profiles, the convex-flow reformulation's can be solved efficiently. If we further conduct a first-order resistance-based approximation of the convex program, a one-step Laplacian-based estimator can be analytically derived in closed forms. The paper also studies random problems where supply and demand points are randomly distributed. We show that the expected optimal matching distance scales with the square root of the number of points if the supply/demand point distributions are identical, or linearly otherwise. In the former case, the optimal flow is proven to be centered, symmetric, and sub-Gaussian. In the latter case, the limiting resistance network characterizes how supply-demand imbalance is redistributed and motivates a fast algorithm that approximate the optimal flow based on the limiting resistance. Numerical experiments show that the proposed estimators closely approximate the exact matching cost while substantially reducing computation time. The proven theoretical properties of the random matching solution are numerically verified by large-scale Monte Carlo simulations.

math.OC↗
arXiv2026

Conformal-DRO: Distributionally Robust Optimization with Conformalized Ambiguity Set

Data-driven distributionally robust optimization (DRO) typically treats the conditional outcome law as fixed and uses ambiguity sets to capture estimation error. This paper studies latent distributional heterogeneity, where each instance has an unobserved law but contributes only one observation, so uncertainty persists even if the mixture law is known. We propose Conformal-DRO, which uses nested conformal regions to construct an ambiguity set for the future latent law. Under exchangeability, the set covers this law with probability at least $1-\alpha$ in finite samples, without estimating underlying latent laws or their mixing mechanism. The conformal path induces a data-driven transport geometry, while $\alpha$ determines the radius. The worst-case problem reduces to a finite linear program over conformal shells and admits sparse adversarial solutions. The resulting robust value provides a finite-sample certificate for the selected decision's expected cost.

math.OC↗
arXiv2026

The best approximation tuple: an extension of the Cheney-Goldstein algorithm and results to the multiple sets case

In this paper we extend the algorithm and several results published in the celebrated 1959 paper of Cheney and Goldstein about the best approximation pair (BAP) problem in two separate directions. One is the consideration of more than two sets. The other is the ability to handle each set as an intersections of a finite family of sets. We call the resulting problem the "Best Approximation Tuple (BAT) problem". The fundamental observation that leads to this generalizations is to recognize and handle one set (the "pivot set") as different from the remaining sets (the "satellite sets") instead of seeking cycles as the minimizers of a target functional. This enable us to overcome a certain theoretical obstacle related to cycles and minimizers of general functionals. We prove the convergence of the algorithm to the unique solution of the problem in the Euclidean case with strictly convex and compact satellite sets. Because of the lack of Fej\'er monotonicity, our convergence analysis is not standard, and is based on almost unknown properties of orthogonal projections regarding equality and inequality in the definition of nonexpansiveness.

math.OC↗