Lecture notes about a simpler approach to Riemann integration

Michael Cwikel

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1311.6021

Lecture notes about a simpler approach to Riemann integration

Michael Cwikel

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

It is of course well known that the usual definitions of Riemann integration and Riemann integrals are equivalent to simpler definitions which can be expressed in terms of just one sequence of partitions, using dyadic intervals or dyadic squares or dyadic cubes for univariate, double, or triple integrals respectively. These lecture notes, intended mainly for undergraduates, present and prove some basic standard results of Riemann integration in detail, taking advantage of this simpler definition. The last section of the notes provides a proof of the equivalence of this definition with the classical one. But the implicit suggestion is that the classical definition need be the concern of specialists only, and that regular students can probably do just about everything that they need to do with Riemann integration by working only with the simpler dyadic definition. This is a preliminary version of these notes which will surely be updated later. It is very difficult to believe that there do not exist any other documents which give a systematic treatment of Riemann integration using this approach. The author would be very grateful for any information about any such documents.

Explore related subjects

math.CA

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Michael Cwikel. 2013-11-23. Lecture notes about a simpler approach to Riemann integration. https://arxiv.org/abs/1311.6021

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

On the log-concavity of the composite Bessel function $x^{\alpha}J_{\nu }\left( \beta x^{\gamma}\right) $

For a twice differentiable function $f:\left( a,b\right) \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ define $v\left( f\right) =f^{\prime}f^{\prime}-f^{\prime\prime }f.$ It is well known that the positivity of $v\left( f\right) $ implies that the function $\left\vert f\right\vert $ is strictly log-concave on each subinterval which does not contain zeros of $f.$ In this paper we provide criteria for the positivity of $v\left( F\right) $ for the composite Bessel function $F\left( x\right) =J_{\alpha,\beta,\gamma,\nu}\left( x\right) :=x^{\alpha}J_{\nu}\left( \beta x^{\gamma}\right) $ for positive numbers $\beta$ and $\gamma$ and real numbers $\alpha$ and $\nu.$

math.CA↗

arXiv2026

Riesz capacity ratios with negative exponents

We investigate sharp inequalities for ratios of Riesz capacities with negative exponents by combining computational experiments with rigorous analysis. For finite subsets of the line, we prove positivity of equilibrium masses when $-1<p<0$, enabling numerical tests of conjectured extremal ratios. In the plane, comparisons of the disk with regular polygon vertex sets reveal a cascade of transitions among the tested competitors and suggest a precise conjecture for the equilibrium measure of odd polygons, for which we give a partial proof. Numerical intersections of equality curves show that the regions where these sets outperform the disk are not simply nested. Similar numerical intersections occur in three dimensions between the regular-simplex equality curve and those of explicit five-point and six-point configurations. Motivated by the dimensional dependence of these comparisons, we prove that for each fixed $p<-2<q<0$, the regular simplex has a larger capacity ratio than the ball in all sufficiently large dimensions. Accompanying Python and Mathematica code supports reproduction and further testing of the conjectures.

math.CA↗

arXiv2026

Shorter proof of dimension-free $L^p$ estimates for maximal Riesz transforms

We provide a shorter and more direct proof of $L^p$ estimates for maximal Riesz transforms (of an arbitrary order) in terms of the corresponding Riesz transforms, with a constant independent of the dimension of the Euclidean space $\mathbb R^d$. This result was originally proved by Mateu, Orobitg, P\'erez and Verdera with a constant depending on the dimension, and improved to a dimension-free inequality by Kucharski, Wr\'obel and Zienkiewicz.

math.CA↗