SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1311.6024

Approximation Algorithms for Regret-Bounded Vehicle Routing and Applications to Distance-Constrained Vehicle Routing

Abstract

We consider vehicle-routing problems (VRPs) that incorporate the notion of {\em regret} of a client, which is a measure of the waiting time of a client relative to its shortest-path distance from the depot. Formally, we consider both the additive and multiplicative versions of, what we call, the {\em regret-bounded vehicle routing problem} (RVRP). In these problems, we are given an undirected complete graph $G=(\{r\}\cup V,E)$ on $n$ nodes with a distinguished root (depot) node $r$, edge costs $\{c_{uv}\}$ that form a metric, and a regret bound $R$. Given a path $P$ rooted at $r$ and a node $v\in P$, let $c_P(v)$ be the distance from $r$ to $v$ along $P$. The goal is to find the fewest number of paths rooted at $r$ that cover all the nodes so that for every node $v$ covered by (say) path $P$: (i) its additive regret $c_P(v)-c_{rv}$, with respect to $P$ is at most $R$ in {\em additive-RVRP}; or (ii) its multiplicative regret, $c_P(c)/c_{rv}$, with respect to $P$ is at most $R$ in {\em multiplicative-RVRP}. Our main result is the {\em first} constant-factor approximation algorithm for additive-RVRP by devising rounding techniques for a natural {\em configuration-style LP}. This is a substantial improvement over the previous-best $O(\log n)$-approximation. Additive-RVRP turns out be a rather central vehicle-routing problem, whose study reveals insights into a variety of other regret-related problems as well as the classical {\em distance-constrained VRP} ({DVRP}). We obtain approximation ratios of $O\bigl(\log(\frac{R}{R-1})\bigr)$ for multiplicative-RVRP, and $O\bigl(\min\bigl\{\mathit{OPT},\frac{\log D}{\log\log D}\bigr\}\bigr)$ for DVRP with distance bound $D$ via reductions to additive-RVRP; the latter improves upon the previous-best approximation for DVRP.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Zachary Friggstad, Chaitanya Swamy. 2013-11-23. Approximation Algorithms for Regret-Bounded Vehicle Routing and Applications to Distance-Constrained Vehicle Routing. https://arxiv.org/abs/1311.6024

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS