SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1311.6375

On Non-Standard Models of Peano Arithmetic and Tennenbaum's Theorem

Abstract

Throughout the course of mathematical history, generalizations of previously understood concepts and structures have led to the fruitful development of the hierarchy of number systems, non-euclidean geometry, and many other epochal phases in mathematical progress. In the study of formalized theories of arithmetic, it is only natural to consider the extension from the standard model of Peano arithmetic, $\langle \mathbb{N},+,\times,\leq,0,1 \rangle$, to non-standard models of arithmetic. The existence of non-standard models of Peano arithmetic provided motivation in the early $20^{th}$ century for a variety of questions in model theory regarding the classification of models up to isomorphism and the properties that non-standard models of Peano arithmetic have. This paper presents these questions and the necessary results to prove Tennenbaum's Theorem, which draws an explicit line between the properties of standard and non-standard models; namely, that no countable non-standard model of Peano arithmetic is recursive. These model-theoretic results have contributed to the foundational framework within which research programs developed by Skolem, Rosser, Tarski, Mostowski and others have flourished. While such foundational topics were crucial to active fields of research during the middle of the $20^{th}$ century, numerous open questions about models of arithmetic, and model theory in general, still remain pertinent to the realm of $21^{st}$ century mathematical discourse.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Samuel Reid. 2013-11-25. On Non-Standard Models of Peano Arithmetic and Tennenbaum's Theorem. https://arxiv.org/abs/1311.6375

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO