SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1311.6544

The non-Urysohn number of a topological space

Abstract

We call a nonempty subset $A$ of a topological space $X$ finitely non-Urysohn if for every nonempty finite subset $F$ of $A$ and every family $\{U_x:x\in F\}$ of open neighborhoods $U_x$ of $x\in F$, $\cap\{\mathrm{cl}(U_x):x\in F\}\ne\emptyset$ and we define the non-Urysohn number of $X$ as follows: $nu(X):=1+\sup\{|A|:A$ is a finitely non-Urysohn subset of $X\}$. Then for any topological space $X$ and any subset $A$ of $X$ we prove the following inequalities: (1) $|\mathrm{cl}_θ(A)|\le |A|^{κ(X)}\cdot nu(X)$, (2) $|[A]_θ|\le (|A|\cdot nu(X))^{κ(X)}$, (3) $|X|\le nu(X)^{κ(X)sL_θ(X)}$, and (4) $|X|\le nu(X)^{κ(X)aL(X)}$. In 1979, A. V. Arhangelskii asked if the inequality $|X|\le 2^{χ(X)wL_c(X)}$ was true for every Hausdorff space $X$. It follows from the third inequality that the answer of this question is in the affirmative for all spaces with $nu(X)$ not greater than the cardinality of the continuum. We also give a simple example of a Hausdorff space $X$ such that $|\mathrm{cl}_θ(A)|>|A|^{χ(X)}U(X)$ and $|\mathrm{cl}_θ(A)|>(|A|\cdot U(X))^{χ(X)}$, where $U(X)$ is the Urysohn number of $X$, recently introduced by Bonanzinga, Cammaroto and Matveev. This example shows that in (1) and (2) above, $nu(X)$ cannot be replaced by $U(X)$ and answers some questions posed by Bella and Cammaroto (1988), Bonanzinga, Cammaroto and Matveev (2011), and Bonanzinga and Pansera (2012).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ivan S. Gotchev. 2013-11-26. The non-Urysohn number of a topological space. https://arxiv.org/abs/1311.6544

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Maximal Center of Distances of Finite Ultrametric Spaces and Perfect Binary Trees

We investigate the finite ultrametric spaces $(X,d)$ that have a given cardinality of the center of distances and a minimal cardinality of the set $X$. It is shown that such spaces are isometric if and only if their centers of distances are the same. The representing trees of these spaces are characterized up to isomorphism.

math.GN

A continuous $3$-distributive frame that is not $\omega$-distributive

We give a negative answer to the question, posed by Ern\'e, whether every $3$-distributive lattice is $\omega$-distributive. More precisely, we exhibit a continuous frame that is $\kappa$-distributive for every integer $\kappa\geq 2$, but is not a wide coframe. The frame is the open-set lattice of a compact, locally compact, countably based $T_0$ topological meet-semilattice, obtained from Lawson's construction in the logarithmic form described by Goubault-Larrecq. The failure of $\omega$-distributivity is witnessed by an explicit matrix with countably many nonempty finite rows: all row joins are the same nonzero element, whereas every choice of one entry from each row has meet zero. The same space answers negatively Ern\'e's accompanying question whether every $4$-web space is a wide web space. All properties of the construction needed for these conclusions are proved directly.

math.GN

An overlooked weakening of perfect normality: Perfect regularity in spaces and locales

We introduce the notion of perfect regularity as an appropriate weakening of perfect normality, both for spaces and locales. Various characterizations are given, using Dedekind-MacNeille completions, injective hulls, and sublocales. We place the new class of perfectly regular frames among various well-studied classes of frames. We also introduce the construction of perfect regularization of a completely regular frame, compare it to Isbell's well-known booleanization construction, and argue that it is at least as important as the latter.

math.GN