Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1311.6716

The Limits of Depth Reduction for Arithmetic Formulas: It's all about the top fan-in

Mrinal Kumar·Shubhangi Saraf
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In recent years, a very exciting and promising method for proving lower bounds for arithmetic circuits has been proposed. This method combines the method of {\it depth reduction} developed in the works of Agrawal-Vinay [AV08], Koiran [Koi12] and Tavenas [Tav13], and the use of the shifted partial derivative complexity measure developed in the works of Kayal [Kay12] and Gupta et al [GKKS13a]. These results inspired a flurry of other beautiful results and strong lower bounds for various classes of arithmetic circuits, in particular a recent work of Kayal et al [KSS13] showing superpolynomial lower bounds for {\it regular} arithmetic formulas via an {\it improved depth reduction} for these formulas. It was left as an intriguing question if these methods could prove superpolynomial lower bounds for general (homogeneous) arithmetic formulas, and if so this would indeed be a breakthrough in arithmetic circuit complexity. In this paper we study the power and limitations of depth reduction and shifted partial derivatives for arithmetic formulas. We do it via studying the class of depth 4 homogeneous arithmetic circuits. We show: (1) the first {\it superpolynomial lower bounds} for the class of homogeneous depth 4 circuits with top fan-in $o(\log n)$. The core of our result is to show {\it improved depth reduction} for these circuits. (2) We show that improved depth reduction {\it is not possible} when the top fan-in is $Ω(\log n)$. In particular this shows that the depth reduction procedure of Koiran and Tavenas [Koi12, Tav13] cannot be improved even for homogeneous formulas, thus strengthening the results of Fournier et al [FLMS13] who showed that depth reduction is tight for circuits, and answering some of the main open questions of [KSS13, FLMS13].

Explore related subjects

cs.CC

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Mrinal Kumar, Shubhangi Saraf. 2013-11-26. The Limits of Depth Reduction for Arithmetic Formulas: It's all about the top fan-in. https://arxiv.org/abs/1311.6716

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The Computational Complexity of Holant Problems on 4-regular Graphs from the Stable Subgroup Sequence of $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$

The Holant framework provides a general setting for studying counting problems and includes graph homomorphisms (\#GH) and counting constraint satisfaction problems (\#CSP) as special cases. Over the past twenty years, a series of computational complexity dichotomies have been established for Holant problems, but the classification for complex-valued signatures is still open. The main obstacle is the case in which all signatures have even arity. In this paper, we establish a dichotomy for Holant problems with a complex-valued 4-ary signature, which is a key base case for the full classification of Holant problems. We present a new strategy by introducing Schur's theorem, the classification of finite subgroups of $\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{C})$ and stable subgroup sequences into the proof. These new techniques are of independent interest.

cs.CC↗
arXiv2026

Topology inside NC$^1$

We show that ACC$^0$ is precisely what can be computed with constant-width circuits of polynomial size and polylogarithmic genus. This extends a characterization given by Hansen, showing that planar constant-width circuits also characterize ACC$^0$. Thus polylogarithmic genus provides no additional computational power in this model. We consider other generalizations of planarity, including crossing number and thickness. We show that constant-width circuits of polynomial size and thickness two already suffice to capture all of NC$^1$.

cs.CC↗