SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1312.5105

Local correlation clustering

Abstract

Correlation clustering is perhaps the most natural formulation of clustering. Given $n$ objects and a pairwise similarity measure, the goal is to cluster the objects so that, to the best possible extent, similar objects are put in the same cluster and dissimilar objects are put in different clusters. Despite its theoretical appeal, the practical relevance of correlation clustering still remains largely unexplored, mainly due to the fact that correlation clustering requires the $Θ(n^2)$ pairwise similarities as input. In this paper we initiate the investigation into \emph{local} algorithms for correlation clustering. In \emph{local correlation clustering} we are given the identifier of a single object and we want to return the cluster to which it belongs in some globally consistent near-optimal clustering, using a small number of similarity queries. Local algorithms for correlation clustering open the door to \emph{sublinear-time} algorithms, which are particularly useful when the similarity between items is costly to compute, as it is often the case in many practical application domains. They also imply $(i)$ distributed and streaming clustering algorithms, $(ii)$ constant-time estimators and testers for cluster edit distance, and $(iii)$ property-preserving parallel reconstruction algorithms for clusterability. Specifically, we devise a local clustering algorithm attaining a $(3, \varepsilon)$-approximation in time $O(1/\varepsilon^2)$ independently of the dataset size. An explicit approximate clustering for all objects can be produced in time $O(n/\varepsilon)$ (which is provably optimal). We also provide a fully additive $(1,\varepsilon)$-approximation with local query complexity $poly(1/\varepsilon)$ and time complexity $2^{poly(1/\varepsilon)}$. The latter yields the fastest polynomial-time approximation scheme for correlation clustering known to date.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Francesco Bonchi, David García-Soriano, Konstantin Kutzkov. 2013-12-18. Local correlation clustering. https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.5105

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS