SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1401.2165

NextBestOnce: Achieving Polylog Routing despite Non-greedy Embeddings

Abstract

Social Overlays suffer from high message delivery delays due to insufficient routing strategies. Limiting connections to device pairs that are owned by individuals with a mutual trust relationship in real life, they form topologies restricted to a subgraph of the social network of their users. While centralized, highly successful social networking services entail a complete privacy loss of their users, Social Overlays at higher performance represent an ideal private and censorship-resistant communication substrate for the same purpose. Routing in such restricted topologies is facilitated by embedding the social graph into a metric space. Decentralized routing algorithms have up to date mainly been analyzed under the assumption of a perfect lattice structure. However, currently deployed embedding algorithms for privacy-preserving Social Overlays cannot achieve a sufficiently accurate embedding and hence conventional routing algorithms fail. Developing Social Overlays with acceptable performance hence requires better models and enhanced algorithms, which guarantee convergence in the presence of local optima with regard to the distance to the target. We suggest a model for Social Overlays that includes inaccurate embeddings and arbitrary degree distributions. We further propose NextBestOnce, a routing algorithm that can achieve polylog routing length despite local optima. We provide analytical bounds on the performance of NextBestOnce assuming a scale-free degree distribution, and furthermore show that its performance can be improved by more than a constant factor when including Neighbor-of-Neighbor information in the routing decisions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Stefanie Roos, Thorsten Strufe. 2014-01-09. NextBestOnce: Achieving Polylog Routing despite Non-greedy Embeddings. https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.2165

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS