Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1402.2857

The Geometric Structure of Max-Plus Hemispaces

Daniel Ehrmann·Zach Higgins·Viorel Nitica
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Given a set S endowed with a convexity structure, a hemispace is a convex subset of S which has convex complement. We recall that R^n_{max} is a semimodule over the max-plus semifield. A convexity structure of current interest is provided by R^n_{max} naturally endowed with the max-plus (or tropical) convexity. In this paper we provide a geometric description of a max-plus hemispace. We show that a max-plus hemispace has a conical decomposition as a finite union of disjoint max-plus cones. These cones can be interpreted as faces of several max-plus hyperplanes. Briec-Horvath proved that the closure of a max-plus hemispace is bounded by a max-plus hyperplane. Given a hyperplane, we give a simple condition for the assignment of the faces between a pair of complementary max-plus hemispaces. Our result allows for counting and enumeration of the associated max-plus hemispaces. We recall that an n-dimensional max-plus hyperplane is called strictly affine and nondegenerate if it has a linear equation that contains all variables x_1,x_2,...,x_n and a free term. We prove that the number of max-plus hemispaces in R^n_max, supported by strictly affine nondegenerate hyperplanes centered in the origin, is twice the n-th ordered Bell number. Our work can be viewed as a complement to the recent results of Katz-Nitica-Sergeev, who described generating sets for max-plus hemispaces, and the results of Briec-Horvath, who proved that closed/open max-plus hemispaces are max-plus closed/open halfspaces.

Explore related subjects

math.MG

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Daniel Ehrmann, Zach Higgins, Viorel Nitica. 2014-02-12. The Geometric Structure of Max-Plus Hemispaces. https://arxiv.org/abs/1402.2857

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Tile sets consisting of two types of concave polygons derived from periodic tilings corresponding to non-periodic tilings with hat and turtle tiles

Using a convex pentagonal monotile belonging to the Type 5 family, we investigate the relationships among the hat tile, turtle tile, and Tile$(1, 1)$. By applying Sugimoto's Perspective and Amfirifma's Perspective, we obtain four types of concave polygons, AH-tile, BH-tile, AT-tile, and BT-tile, each having Heesch number 1 under the conditions considered. We show that these polygons correspond to clusters used to generate the non-periodic tilings $\mathscr{T}_h$ and $\mathscr{T}_s$. We further discuss the possibility that tile sets consisting of pairs selected from these polygons may correspond to $\textit{ASPmr}\{\text{A-tile}, \text{B-tile}\}$.

math.MG↗
arXiv2026

The mean distance to a simple closed curve on the sphere

Kimberling's Problem 10 asks for a simple closed curve of prescribed length $L$ (in particular, $L=4\pi$) on the unit sphere minimizing the mean geodesic distance $\mathcal{J}$ from a point of the sphere to the curve. For a positive integer $n$, put $\vartheta_{n}=\pi/(2n)$ and $L_{n}=2\pi/\sin\vartheta_{n}$. We show that the minimum of $\mathcal{J}$ over rectifiable simple closed curves of length at most $L_{n}$ equals $\vartheta_{n}-\tan(\vartheta_{n}/2)$, that it is attained only by curves of length exactly $L_{n}$, and that the sphere-filling ropes $\beta^{n,k}$ of Gerlach and von der Mosel attain it. Kimberling's case is $n=3$: at $L=4\pi$ the minimum is $\pi/6+\sqrt{3}-2=0.255649\ldots$, attained by an explicit six-arc curve and by its mirror image. For $L\le2\pi$ we determine $J(L)$, the infimum of $\mathcal{J}$ over curves of length $L$, exactly: it equals $\pi/2-L/(2\pi)$, attained precisely by the circles of length $L$. At the lengths $L_{n}$ we do not classify all minimizers, but show that every one of them bisects the sphere into two disks of area $2\pi$ and inradius $\vartheta_{n}$ whose inward collars have the largest possible area at every depth. The great circle is the only minimizer for $n=1$, and the $\beta^{n,k}$ are, up to congruence, the only ones of thickness at least $\sin\vartheta_{n}$. For arbitrary $L$ the function $J$ is nonincreasing, and together with the above this brackets it between two explicit values.

math.MG↗
arXiv2026

The topology of Gromov--Hausdorff space

We prove that the Gromov--Hausdorff space is homeomorphic to the Hilbert space. This paper is divided into four parts. In Part I, we construct an assignment of a full-support probability measure to every nonempty compact metric space that respects isometries and is continuous for simultaneous Hausdorff convergence of the spaces and weak convergence of the measures. In Part II, we use these measures to construct finite-dimensional local models whose induced pseudometrics approximate the original distances uniformly and whose norms and point maps vary continuously up to orthogonal changes of coordinates. In Part III, we use the local models to prove that the Gromov--Hausdorff space is an absolute retract for all metrizable spaces. In Part IV, we establish a discrete approximation property and conclude that the space of isometry classes of nonempty compact metric spaces is homeomorphic to the real separable infinite-dimensional Hilbert space.

math.MG↗