arXiv · 1402.2954
Reply to comments on "Weak value amplification is suboptimal for estimation and detection"
Abstract
Kedem's Comment [arXiv:1402.1352] on our Letter [PRL 112, 040406 (2014)] contains only the criticism that we did not consider complex weak values. We point out follow-up work which uses the same analysis as in our Letter, includes any type of weak values and draws the same conclusion. Vaidman's Comment [arXiv:1402.0199] on our Letter can be deconstructed in to two distinct logical fallacies.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Christopher Ferrie, Joshua Combes. 2014-02-12. Reply to comments on "Weak value amplification is suboptimal for estimation and detection". https://arxiv.org/abs/1402.2954
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.