SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1402.4037

Near-Linear Query Complexity for Graph Inference

Abstract

How efficiently can we find an unknown graph using distance or shortest path queries between its vertices? Let $G = (V,E)$ be an unweighted, connected graph of bounded degree. The edge set $E$ is initially unknown, and the graph can be accessed using a \emph{distance oracle}, which receives a pair of vertices $(u,v)$ and returns the distance between $u$ and $v$. In the \emph{verification} problem, we are given a hypothetical graph $\hat G = (V,\hat E)$ and want to check whether $G$ is equal to $\hat G$. We analyze a natural greedy algorithm and prove that it uses $n^{1+o(1)}$ distance queries. In the more difficult \emph{reconstruction} problem, $\hat G$ is not given, and the goal is to find the graph $G$. If the graph can be accessed using a \emph{shortest path oracle}, which returns not just the distance but an actual shortest path between $u$ and $v$, we show that extending the idea of greedy gives a reconstruction algorithm that uses $n^{1+o(1)}$ shortest path queries. When the graph has bounded treewidth, we further bound the query complexity of the greedy algorithms for both problems by $\tilde O(n)$. When the graph is chordal, we provide a randomized algorithm for reconstruction using $\tilde O(n)$ distance queries.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Sampath Kannan, Claire Mathieu, Hang Zhou. 2014-02-17. Near-Linear Query Complexity for Graph Inference. https://arxiv.org/abs/1402.4037

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS