The Input/Output Complexity of Sparse Matrix Multiplication

Rasmus Pagh; Morten Stöckel

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1403.3551

The Input/Output Complexity of Sparse Matrix Multiplication

Rasmus Pagh·Morten Stöckel

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We consider the problem of multiplying sparse matrices (over a semiring) where the number of non-zero entries is larger than main memory. In the classical paper of Hong and Kung (STOC '81) it was shown that to compute a product of dense $U \times U$ matrices, $Θ\left(U^3 / (B \sqrt{M}) \right)$ I/Os are necessary and sufficient in the I/O model with internal memory size $M$ and memory block size $B$. In this paper we generalize the upper and lower bounds of Hong and Kung to the sparse case. Our bounds depend of the number $N = \mathtt{nnz}(A)+\mathtt{nnz}(C)$ of nonzero entries in $A$ and $C$, as well as the number $Z = \mathtt{nnz}(AC)$ of nonzero entries in $AC$. We show that $AC$ can be computed using $\tilde{O} \left(\tfrac{N}{B} \min\left(\sqrt{\tfrac{Z}{M}},\tfrac{N}{M}\right) \right)$ I/Os, with high probability. This is tight (up to polylogarithmic factors) when only semiring operations are allowed, even for dense rectangular matrices: We show a lower bound of $Ω\left(\tfrac{N}{B} \min\left(\sqrt{\tfrac{Z}{M}},\tfrac{N}{M}\right) \right)$ I/Os. While our lower bound uses fairly standard techniques, the upper bound makes use of ``compressed matrix multiplication'' sketches, which is new in the context of I/O-efficient algorithms, and a new matrix product size estimation technique that avoids the ``no cancellation'' assumption.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Rasmus Pagh, Morten Stöckel. 2014-03-14. The Input/Output Complexity of Sparse Matrix Multiplication. https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.3551

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗