Remarks on the Egyptian 2/D table in favor of a global approach (D composite number)

Lionel Bréhamet

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1404.0341

Remarks on the Egyptian 2/D table in favor of a global approach (D composite number)

Lionel Bréhamet

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Egyptian decompositions of 2/D as a sum of two unit fractions are studied by means of certain divisors of D, namely r and s. Our analysis does not concern the method to find r and s, but just why the scribes have chosen a solution instead of another. A comprehensive approach, unconventional, is developed which implies having an overview of all pre-calculated alternatives. Difference s-r is the basis of the classification to be examined before taking the right decisions, step by step, if difficulties are encountered. An adequate adjustment of s-r limits the number of all alternatives to 57, what is very few. A four-component generator (2/3, 2/5, 2/7, 2/11) operates as a (hidden) mother-table. Adding few logical rules of common sense is enough to explain the reasons of the Egyptian choices. Even the singular case 2/95, which can not be decomposed into two fractions but only into three, reveals a doubly justified explanation.

Explore related subjects

math.HO

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Lionel Bréhamet. 2014-04-01. Remarks on the Egyptian 2/D table in favor of a global approach (D composite number). https://arxiv.org/abs/1404.0341

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO↗

arXiv2026

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO↗

arXiv2026

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO↗