SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1404.6592

Whitney Forms for Spherical Triangles I: The Euler, Cagnoli, and Tuynman Area Formulas, Barycentric Coordinates, and Construction with the Exterior Calculus

Abstract

We establish the equivalence of the Tuynman midpoint area formula for a spherical triangle to the classical area formulas of Euler and of Cagnoli. The derivation also yields a variant of the Cagnoli formula in terms of the medial triangle. We introduce the three barycentric coordinates of a point within the spherical triangle as area ratios which sum to unity. The barycentric coordinates are the Whitney 0-forms, scalar functions over the domain of the triangle associated with each vertex. We then construct, by exterior differentiation of the barycentric coordinates, succinct expressions for the Whitney 1-forms associated with each geodesic side, or great circle arc. The Euler formula, in conjunction with that of Tuynman, facilitates the differentiation of a triangular area with respect to the position of a vertex. As both the Euler and Tuynman formulas may be expressed naturally in terms of the position vectors of the vertices on an embedded sphere, the Whitney constructions may be done in terms of vector-valued forms and without recourse to a particular projection or coordinate chart. Finally, we exhibit the Whitney 2-form of the triangle, which must be the product of a scalar function and the area 2-form of the sphere. We find an expression for this scalar function in terms of determinants of $3 \times 3$ matrices built from the vertex position vectors. It is a rational function in the Cartesian coordinates of a point. By construction it must be invariant under cyclic permutations of the three vertices, though it is not manifestly so. Also by construction the Whitney 2-form must integrate to one over the triangle. Thus the rational function is exactly integrable over its triangle when restricted to the sphere.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

David W. Fillmore, Jay P. Fillmore. 2014-04-26. Whitney Forms for Spherical Triangles I: The Euler, Cagnoli, and Tuynman Area Formulas, Barycentric Coordinates, and Construction with the Exterior Calculus. https://arxiv.org/abs/1404.6592

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The $q$-deformed cross-ratio: modular invariants and Coxeter friezes

We introduce and study a scalar $q$-deformation of the cross-ratio on $\mathbb P^1(\mathbb Q)$. Our construction is based on the notion of $q$-deformed rational numbers due to Morier-Genoud and the author. The $q$-cross-ratio is invariant under $\mathrm{PSL}(2,\mathbb{Z})$, while elements of determinant $-1$ of $\mathrm{PGL}(2,\mathbb{Z})$ act by $q\mapsto q^{-1}$. A principal result is its relation to $q$-deformed Coxeter friezes associated with rational polygons. The expansion at $q=e^h$ yields an algebraically independent sequence of modular invariants and relative invariants, although this sequence does not separate modular orbits. We compute the first two nonconstant coefficients of this expansion explicitly.

math.DG

The Cartan-Hadamard conjecture in dimension five

We show that the sharp Euclidean isoperimetric inequality holds for domains in complete simply connected Riemannian $5$-manifolds of nonpositive sectional curvature, which establishes the Cartan-Hadamard conjecture in that dimension. The main step is a sharp inequality for constant-mean-curvature hypersurfaces, proved via integrals over pairs of boundary points, in the spirit of Banchoff-Pohl, together with an estimate for Jacobi fields along geodesic chords. The inequality persists for boundaries of isoperimetric regions in geodesic balls, whose mean curvature is constant only on the free part. An isoperimetric-profile argument, after Kleiner, completes the proof. Our method also gives a new proof in dimension $3$.

math.DG

On static manifolds with boundary admitting a nowhere-vanishing static potential

We study complete static manifolds with boundary admitting a nowhere-vanishing static potential. Our main result shows that, under a natural lower bound relating the scalar curvature and the boundary mean curvature, a simple static manifold with boundary must in fact have positive scalar curvature, negative boundary mean curvature, and be compact; we also obtain explicit relations and estimates involving the volume of the manifold and the geometry of its boundary. In the scalar-flat case, we prove global splitting and Ricci-flat rigidity results, including for disconnected boundary, while in the negative scalar curvature case we establish a sharp mean-curvature bound and characterize the equality case by an exponential warped-product structure. The proofs rely essentially on the study of the associated Einstein manifold. In appendix we derive several identities for static manifolds with boundary and discuss the associated Einstein manifold technique in the boundaryless setting.

math.DG