Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1405.0122

Newton's problem of minimal resistance under the single-impact assumption

Alexander Plakhov
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A parallel flow of non-interacting point particles is incident on a body at rest. When hitting the body's surface, the particles are reflected elastically. Assume that each particle hits the body at most once (SIC condition); then the force of resistance of the body along the flow direction can be written down in a simple analytical form. The problem of minimal resistance within this model was first considered by Newton (1687) in the class of bodies with a fixed length M along the flow direction and with a fixed maximum orthogonal cross section, under the additional conditions that the body is convex and rotationally symmetric. Here we solve the problem (first stated by Ferone, Buttazzo, and Kawohl in 1995) for the wider class of bodies satisfying SIC and with the additional conditions removed. The scheme of solution is inspired by Besicovitch's method of solving the Kakeya problem. If the maximum cross section is a disc, the decrease of resistance as compared with the original Newton problem is more than twofold; the ratio tends to 2 as M goes to 0 and to 81/4 as M goes to infinity. We also prove that the infimum of resistance is 0 for a wider class of bodies with both single and double impacts allowed.

Explore related subjects

math.CAmath.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Alexander Plakhov. 2014-05-01. Newton's problem of minimal resistance under the single-impact assumption. https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.0122

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

On the log-concavity of the composite Bessel function $x^{\alpha}J_{\nu }\left( \beta x^{\gamma}\right) $

For a twice differentiable function $f:\left( a,b\right) \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ define $v\left( f\right) =f^{\prime}f^{\prime}-f^{\prime\prime }f.$ It is well known that the positivity of $v\left( f\right) $ implies that the function $\left\vert f\right\vert $ is strictly log-concave on each subinterval which does not contain zeros of $f.$ In this paper we provide criteria for the positivity of $v\left( F\right) $ for the composite Bessel function $F\left( x\right) =J_{\alpha,\beta,\gamma,\nu}\left( x\right) :=x^{\alpha}J_{\nu}\left( \beta x^{\gamma}\right) $ for positive numbers $\beta$ and $\gamma$ and real numbers $\alpha$ and $\nu.$

math.CA↗
arXiv2026

Riesz capacity ratios with negative exponents

We investigate sharp inequalities for ratios of Riesz capacities with negative exponents by combining computational experiments with rigorous analysis. For finite subsets of the line, we prove positivity of equilibrium masses when $-1<p<0$, enabling numerical tests of conjectured extremal ratios. In the plane, comparisons of the disk with regular polygon vertex sets reveal a cascade of transitions among the tested competitors and suggest a precise conjecture for the equilibrium measure of odd polygons, for which we give a partial proof. Numerical intersections of equality curves show that the regions where these sets outperform the disk are not simply nested. Similar numerical intersections occur in three dimensions between the regular-simplex equality curve and those of explicit five-point and six-point configurations. Motivated by the dimensional dependence of these comparisons, we prove that for each fixed $p<-2<q<0$, the regular simplex has a larger capacity ratio than the ball in all sufficiently large dimensions. Accompanying Python and Mathematica code supports reproduction and further testing of the conjectures.

math.CA↗
arXiv2026

Shorter proof of dimension-free $L^p$ estimates for maximal Riesz transforms

We provide a shorter and more direct proof of $L^p$ estimates for maximal Riesz transforms (of an arbitrary order) in terms of the corresponding Riesz transforms, with a constant independent of the dimension of the Euclidean space $\mathbb R^d$. This result was originally proved by Mateu, Orobitg, P\'erez and Verdera with a constant depending on the dimension, and improved to a dimension-free inequality by Kucharski, Wr\'obel and Zienkiewicz.

math.CA↗