SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1405.5996

Reasoning about Primes (I)

Abstract

We prove the twin prime conjecture and the generalized conjectures of Kronecker and Polignac. Key to the proofs is a new theoretical sieve that combines two concepts that go back to Eratosthenes: the 'sieve' filtering a finite set of numbers and the 'hydra' as a representation of infinity. Using functional programming notation (and a reference implementation in R) we define a data structure 'hydra' that partitions the infinite set of numbers into a finite set of partitions. On top of this data structure we define an algorithm 'split' which sub-partitions each partition using the modulus prime function. Hydra splitting along the natural sequence of primes is a recursive version of wheel factorization. Hydra recursion allows elementary proofs of some statements about primes. We consider one new and two classical proof structures. Using these proof methods we find that hydra recursion proves the infinity of twin primes. Then we show how to use specific selections of primes to create hydras that contain pairs of partitions with arbitrary even distance, which proves Maillet's conjecture and the stricter 'consecutive existence conjecture'. Together with our proof methodology we obtain elementary proofs of Kronecker's and Polignac's conjecture.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jens Oehlschlägel. 2014-05-23. Reasoning about Primes (I). https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.5996

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO