Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1407.2524

An improved analysis of the M\"omke-Svensson algorithm for graph-TSP on subquartic graphs

Alantha Newman
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

M\"omke and Svensson presented a beautiful new approach for the traveling salesman problem on a graph metric (graph-TSP), which yields a $4/3$-approximation guarantee on subcubic graphs as well as a substantial improvement over the $3/2$-approximation guarantee of Christofides' algorithm on general graphs. The crux of their approach is to compute an upper bound on the minimum cost of a circulation in a particular network, $C(G,T)$, where $G$ is the input graph and $T$ is a carefully chosen spanning tree. The cost of this circulation is directly related to the number of edges in a tour output by their algorithm. Mucha subsequently improved the analysis of the circulation cost, proving that M\"omke and Svensson's algorithm for graph-TSP has an approximation ratio of at most $13/9$ on general graphs. This analysis of the circulation is local, and vertices with degree four and five can contribute the most to its cost. Thus, hypothetically, there could exist a subquartic graph (a graph with degree at most four at each vertex) for which Mucha's analysis of the M\"omke-Svensson algorithm is tight. We show that this is not the case and that M\"omke and Svensson's algorithm for graph-TSP has an approximation guarantee of at most $25/18$ on subquartic graphs. To prove this, we present different methods to upper bound the minimum cost of a circulation on the network $C(G,T)$. Our approximation guarantee holds for all graphs that have an optimal solution to a standard linear programming relaxation of graph-TSP with subquartic support.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Alantha Newman. 2014-07-09. An improved analysis of the M\"omke-Svensson algorithm for graph-TSP on subquartic graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.2524

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗