SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1409.1456

Accurate, fully-automated NMR spectral profiling for metabolomics

Abstract

Many diseases cause significant changes to the concentrations of small molecules (aka metabolites) that appear in a person's biofluids, which means such diseases can often be readily detected from a person's "metabolic profile". This information can be extracted from a biofluid's NMR spectrum. Today, this is often done manually by trained human experts, which means this process is relatively slow, expensive and error-prone. This paper presents a tool, Bayesil, that can quickly, accurately and autonomously produce a complex biofluid's (e.g., serum or CSF) metabolic profile from a 1D1H NMR spectrum. This requires first performing several spectral processing steps then matching the resulting spectrum against a reference compound library, which contains the "signatures" of each relevant metabolite. Many of these steps are novel algorithms and our matching step views spectral matching as an inference problem within a probabilistic graphical model that rapidly approximates the most probable metabolic profile. Our extensive studies on a diverse set of complex mixtures, show that Bayesil can autonomously find the concentration of all NMR-detectable metabolites accurately (~90% correct identification and ~10% quantification error), in <5minutes on a single CPU. These results demonstrate that Bayesil is the first fully-automatic publicly-accessible system that provides quantitative NMR spectral profiling effectively -- with an accuracy that meets or exceeds the performance of trained experts. We anticipate this tool will usher in high-throughput metabolomics and enable a wealth of new applications of NMR in clinical settings. Available at http://www.bayesil.ca.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Siamak Ravanbakhsh, Philip Liu, Trent Bjorndahl, Rupasri Mandal, Jason R. Grant, Michael Wilson, Roman Eisner, Igor Sinelnikov, Xiaoyu Hu, Claudio Luchinat, Russell Greiner, David S. Wishart. 2014-09-08. Accurate, fully-automated NMR spectral profiling for metabolomics. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124219

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI