Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1409.4222

Boolean and ortho fuzzy subset logics

Daniel J. Greenhoe
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Constructing a fuzzy subset logic L with Boolean properties is notoriously difficult because under a handful of "reasonable" conditions, we have the following three debilitating constraints: (1) Bellman and Giertz in 1973 showed that if L is distributive, then it must be idempotent. (2) Dubois and Padre in 1980 showed that if L has the excluded middle or the non-contradiction property or both, then it must be non-idempotent. (3) Bellman and Giertz also demonstrated in 1973 that even if L is idempotent, then the only choice available for the (meet,join) logic operator pair is the (min,max) operator pair. Thus it would seem impossible to construct a non-trivial fuzzy subset logic with Boolean properties. However, this paper examines these three results in detail, and shows that "hidden" in the hypotheses of the three is the assumption that the operator pair (meet,join) is pointwise evaluated. It is further demonstrated that removing this constraint yields the following results: (A) It is indeed possible to construct fuzzy subset logics that have all the Boolean properties, including that of idempotency, non-contradiction, excluded middle, and distributivity. (B) Even if idempotency holds, (min,max) is not the only choice for (meet,join).

Explore related subjects

math.LOmath.ACmath.RA

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Daniel J. Greenhoe. 2014-09-15. Boolean and ortho fuzzy subset logics. https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.4222

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO↗