Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1410.0823

Geometric mean method for judgement matrices: Formulas for errors

I. L. Tomashevskii
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The geometric mean method (GMM) and the eigenvector method (EM) are well-known approaches to deriving information from pairwise comparison matrices in decision making processes. However, the original algorithms of these methods are logically incomplete and have significant drawbacks: their actual numerical errors are unknown and their reliability is doubted by different rank reversal phenomena including the GMM-EM ones. Recently (Tomashevskii 2015: Eur J Oper Res 240:774-780), the actual numerical errors were found for EM, and it was shown that all EM rank reversal phenomena have the same cause and are eliminated when the errors are taken into account. In this paper the similar ap-proach is used for GMM: we associate GMM with some standard measuring procedure, ana-lyze this procedure from the viewpoint of measurement theory, and find the actual GMM errors. We show that the GMM and the GMM-EM rank reversal phenomena are eliminated when the GMM and the EM errors are taken into account. The GMM decision support tool, which has all components of a standard measuring tool, is composed of pairwise comparisons as an initial measuring procedure, GMM as a data processor, and the obtained formulas for GMM errors as an error indicator. This tool is analogous to the EM decision support tool received earlier in the above paper. It is shown that the EM and the GMM versions of the tool are equally suitable to measure and rank any comparable elements with positive numerical values. We also analyze the Geometric Consistency Index usually used in the original GMM to measure of the inconsistency and to accept or reject an inconsistent pairwise comparison matrix, and show that this index is not an acceptable GMM error indicator.

Explore related subjects

math.OC

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

I. L. Tomashevskii. 2014-10-03. Geometric mean method for judgement matrices: Formulas for errors. https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.0823

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Deterministic and Random Bipartite Matching on General Networks: Convex Flow Reformulation, Asymptotic Properties, and Fast Algorithms

Minimum-distance bipartite matching on general networks has numerous applications various fields. This paper first focuses on deterministic problems and presents an exact edgewise-separable convex-flow reformulation. By introducing a smooth monotone rearrangement approximation of the edge-wise imbalance profiles, the convex-flow reformulation's can be solved efficiently. If we further conduct a first-order resistance-based approximation of the convex program, a one-step Laplacian-based estimator can be analytically derived in closed forms. The paper also studies random problems where supply and demand points are randomly distributed. We show that the expected optimal matching distance scales with the square root of the number of points if the supply/demand point distributions are identical, or linearly otherwise. In the former case, the optimal flow is proven to be centered, symmetric, and sub-Gaussian. In the latter case, the limiting resistance network characterizes how supply-demand imbalance is redistributed and motivates a fast algorithm that approximate the optimal flow based on the limiting resistance. Numerical experiments show that the proposed estimators closely approximate the exact matching cost while substantially reducing computation time. The proven theoretical properties of the random matching solution are numerically verified by large-scale Monte Carlo simulations.

math.OC↗
arXiv2026

Conformal-DRO: Distributionally Robust Optimization with Conformalized Ambiguity Set

Data-driven distributionally robust optimization (DRO) typically treats the conditional outcome law as fixed and uses ambiguity sets to capture estimation error. This paper studies latent distributional heterogeneity, where each instance has an unobserved law but contributes only one observation, so uncertainty persists even if the mixture law is known. We propose Conformal-DRO, which uses nested conformal regions to construct an ambiguity set for the future latent law. Under exchangeability, the set covers this law with probability at least $1-\alpha$ in finite samples, without estimating underlying latent laws or their mixing mechanism. The conformal path induces a data-driven transport geometry, while $\alpha$ determines the radius. The worst-case problem reduces to a finite linear program over conformal shells and admits sparse adversarial solutions. The resulting robust value provides a finite-sample certificate for the selected decision's expected cost.

math.OC↗
arXiv2026

The best approximation tuple: an extension of the Cheney-Goldstein algorithm and results to the multiple sets case

In this paper we extend the algorithm and several results published in the celebrated 1959 paper of Cheney and Goldstein about the best approximation pair (BAP) problem in two separate directions. One is the consideration of more than two sets. The other is the ability to handle each set as an intersections of a finite family of sets. We call the resulting problem the "Best Approximation Tuple (BAT) problem". The fundamental observation that leads to this generalizations is to recognize and handle one set (the "pivot set") as different from the remaining sets (the "satellite sets") instead of seeking cycles as the minimizers of a target functional. This enable us to overcome a certain theoretical obstacle related to cycles and minimizers of general functionals. We prove the convergence of the algorithm to the unique solution of the problem in the Euclidean case with strictly convex and compact satellite sets. Because of the lack of Fej\'er monotonicity, our convergence analysis is not standard, and is based on almost unknown properties of orthogonal projections regarding equality and inequality in the definition of nonexpansiveness.

math.OC↗