SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1410.3438

Efficient and Compact Representations of Prefix Codes

Abstract

Most of the attention in statistical compression is given to the space used by the compressed sequence, a problem completely solved with optimal prefix codes. However, in many applications, the storage space used to represent the prefix code itself can be an issue. In this paper we introduce and compare several techniques to store prefix codes. Let $N$ be the sequence length and $n$ be the alphabet size. Then a naive storage of an optimal prefix code uses $O(n\log n)$ bits. Our first technique shows how to use $O(n\log\log(N/n))$ bits to store the optimal prefix code. Then we introduce an approximate technique that, for any $0<ε<1/2$, takes $O(n \log \log (1 / ε))$ bits to store a prefix code with average codeword length within an additive $ε$ of the minimum. Finally, a second approximation takes, for any constant $c > 1$, $O(n^{1 / c} \log n)$ bits to store a prefix code with average codeword length at most $c$ times the minimum. In all cases, our data structures allow encoding and decoding of any symbol in $O(1)$ time. We experimentally compare our new techniques with the state of the art, showing that we achieve 6--8-fold space reductions, at the price of a slower encoding (2.5--8 times slower) and decoding (12--24 times slower). The approximations further reduce this space and improve the time significantly, up to recovering the speed of classical implementations, for a moderate penalty in the average code length. As a byproduct, we compare various heuristic, approximate, and optimal algorithms to generate length-restricted codes, showing that the optimal ones are clearly superior and practical enough to be implemented.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Travis Gagie, Gonzalo Navarro, Yakov Nekrich, Alberto Ordóñez. 2015-06-29. Efficient and Compact Representations of Prefix Codes. https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.3438

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS