Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1410.4312

Zero-Correlation Linear Cryptanalysis of Reduced-round MISTY1

Wentan Yi·Shaozhen Chen
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The MISTY1 algorithm, proposed by Matsui in FSE 1997, is a block cipher with a 64-bit block size and a 128-bit key size. It was recommended by the European NESSIE project and the CRYPTREC project, and became one RFC in 2002 and an ISO standard in 2005, respectively. In this paper, we first investigate the properties of the FL linear function and identify 232 subkey- dependent zero-correlation linear approximations over 5-round MISTY1 with 3 FL layers. Fur- thermore, some observations on the FL, FO and FI functions are founded and based upon those observations, we select 27 subkey-dependent zero-correlation linear approximations and then, pro- pose the zero-correlation linear attacks on 7-round MISTY1 with 4 FL layers. Besides, for the case without FL layers, 27 zero-correlation linear approximations over 5-round MISTY1 are employed to the analysis of 7-round MISTY1. The zero-correlation linear attack on the 7-round with 4 FL layers needs about 2^{119:5} encryptions with 2^{62.9} known plaintexts and 2^61 memory bytes. For the attack on 7-round without FL layers, the data complexity is about 2^{63.9} known plaintexts, the time complexity is about 2^{81} encryptions and the memory requirements are about 2^{93} bytes. Both have lower time complexity than previous attacks.

Explore related subjects

cs.CR

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Wentan Yi, Shaozhen Chen. 2014-10-16. Zero-Correlation Linear Cryptanalysis of Reduced-round MISTY1. https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.4312

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Empirical Evaluation of Membership Inference Attacks on NLP Text Classifiers: A Baseline Study on SST-2

Membership inference attacks (MIAs) try to determine whether a specific record was used to train a model, a privacy risk that matters in natural language processing (NLP), where training data can contain sensitive user text. This paper presents a controlled benchmark of membership inference vulnerability for text classification on the GLUE SST-2 sentiment dataset. A TF-IDF + Logistic Regression pipeline and a fine-tuned DistilBERT classifier are compared under a loss-threshold MIA, with utility measured by development accuracy and macro F1. DistilBERT reached 0.9466 accuracy and 0.9460 macro F1 against 0.8756 and 0.8727 for Logistic Regression, yet both models leaked membership signal (Attack AUC 0.5615 and 0.5800, respectively). Two mitigations were tested. Stronger regularization reduced leakage for Logistic Regression at a visible utility cost, whereas fine-tuning DistilBERT for 2 epochs instead of 3 reduced leakage with negligible accuracy loss. Lightweight training adjustments can improve the privacy-utility trade-off without complex defenses.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

Empirical Evaluation of Data Poisoning Attacks in Supervised Learning

Data poisoning corrupts training data to degrade a model or to plant attacker-controlled behavior. This study evaluates two representative training-time attacks, label flipping and backdoor poisoning, on MNIST and Fashion-MNIST with three baseline classifiers: Logistic Regression, Linear SVM, and Random Forest. Clean training is compared with poisoning rates of 5%, 10%, and 20% using clean-test accuracy, macro-precision, macro-recall, macro-F1, and, for backdoors, attack success rate. Label flipping caused clear degradation, largest for Logistic Regression and Linear SVM, while Random Forest stayed comparatively stable. Backdoor poisoning reached attack success rates from 0.9667 to 1.0000 on both datasets and all three models while often keeping clean-test performance near baseline. The results separate indiscriminate poisoning, which shows up in standard metrics, from targeted backdoor poisoning, which stays comparatively stealthy while embedding highly effective malicious behavior, and they support security-oriented evaluation beyond conventional clean-test metrics.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

DeFiFusion: Combining Transaction Events with Smart Contracts to Detect Price Manipulation Attacks

Decentralized Finance (DeFi) has emerged as a rapidly growing blockchain-based financial service, where market transaction dynamics and underlying smart contract logic are intricately intertwined. This autonomous interplay, while eliminating centralized intermediaries, significantly expands the vulnerability surface of DeFi protocols to Price Manipulation Attacks (PMAs), which have already inflicted catastrophic financial losses. Despite their gravity, existing detection paradigms suffer from fundamental limitations. Transaction-centric methods lack awareness of contract execution semantics, making them prone to false positives under legitimate market volatility, while static contract analyses ignore real transaction behaviors and frequently report vulnerabilities that are infeasible to exploit in practice. We present DeFiFusion, a dual-modal PMA detection framework that closes this gap by jointly modeling transaction events and smart contract semantics within a unified pipeline. Our core insight is that PMA maliciousness emerges only from the interaction between transaction behaviors and the contract logic they exploit; neither signal suffices in isolation. Accordingly, we derive price-manipulation-aware event encoding for extracting fine-grained temporal and economic features tailored to manipulation patterns. We further introduce LLM-based contract semantic extraction to supply the execution-logic context that prior behavioral methods lack. To fuse these modalities, we propose a Dual-Modal Projection-Fusion Transformer with T5-style relative positional encoding, capturing the cyclic multi-stage execution structures that distinguish PMAs from benign market activity. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DeFiFusion consistently achieves state-of-the-art detection performance, effectively recalling 222 of the 225 PMA cases while maintaining a precision of 96.10%.

cs.CR↗