SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1411.4982

Sample(x)=(a*x<=t) is a distinguisher with probability 1/8

Abstract

A random sampling function Sample:U->{0,1} for a key universe U is a distinguisher with probability p if for any given assignment of values v(x) to the keys x in U, including at least one non-zero v(x)!=0, the sampled sum sum{ v(x) | x in U and Sample(x) } is non-zero with probability at least p. Here the key values may come from any commutative monoid (addition is commutative and associative and zero is neutral). Such distinguishers were introduced by Vazirani [PhD thesis 1986], and Naor and Naor used them for their small bias probability spaces [STOC'90]. Constant probability distinguishers are used for testing in contexts where the key values are not computed directly, yet where the sum is easily computed. A simple example is when we get a stream of key value pairs (x_1,v_1),(x_2,v_2),...,(x_n,v_n) where the same key may appear many times. The accumulated value of key x is v(x)=sum{v_i | x_i=x}. For space reasons, we may not be able to maintain v(x) for every key x, but the sampled sum is easily maintained as the single value sum{v_i | Sample(x_i)}. Here we show that when dealing with w-bit integers, if a is a uniform odd w-bit integer and t is a uniform w-bit integer, then Sample(x)=[ax mod 2^w <= t] is a distinguisher with probability 1/8. Working with standard units, that is, w=8, 16, 32, 64, we exploit that w-bit multiplication works modulo 2^w, discarding overflow automatically, and then the sampling decision is implemented by the C-code a*x<=t. Previous such samplers were much less computer friendly, e.g., the distinguisher of Naor and Naor [STOC'90] was more complicated and involved a 7-independent hash function.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Mikkel Thorup. 2014-11-18. Sample(x)=(a*x<=t) is a distinguisher with probability 1/8. https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.4982

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS