SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1411.6915

Kernelization Algorithms for Packing Problems Allowing Overlaps (Extended Version)

Abstract

We consider the problem of discovering overlapping communities in networks which we model as generalizations of Graph Packing problems with overlap. We seek a collection $\mathcal{S}' \subseteq \mathcal{S}$ consisting of at least $k$ sets subject to certain disjointness restrictions. In the $r$-Set Packing with $t$-Membership, each element of $\mathcal{U}$ belongs to at most $t$ sets of $\mathcal{S'}$ while in $t$-Overlap each pair of sets in $\mathcal{S'}$ overlaps in at most $t$ elements. Each set of $\mathcal{S}$ has at most $r$ elements. Similarly, both of our graph packing problems seek a collection $\mathcal{K}$ of at least $k$ subgraphs in a graph $G$ each isomorphic to a graph $H \in \mathcal{H}$. In $\mathcal{H}$-Packing with $t$-Membership, each vertex of $G$ belongs to at most $t$ subgraphs of $\mathcal{K}$ while in $t$-Overlap each pair of subgraphs in $\mathcal{K}$ overlaps in at most $t$ vertices. Each member of $\mathcal{H}$ has at most $r$ vertices and $m$ edges. We show NP-Completeness results for all of our packing problems and we give a dichotomy result for the $\mathcal{H}$-Packing with $t$-Membership problem analogous to the Kirkpatrick and Hell \cite{Kirk78}. We reduce the $r$-Set Packing with $t$-Membership to a problem kernel with $O((r+1)^r k^{r})$ elements while we achieve a kernel with $O(r^r k^{r-t-1})$ elements for the $r$-Set Packing with $t$-Overlap. In addition, we reduce the $\mathcal{H}$-Packing with $t$-Membership and its edge version to problem kernels with $O((r+1)^r k^{r})$ and $O((m+1)^{m} k^{{m}})$ vertices, respectively. On the other hand, we achieve kernels with $O(r^r k^{r-t-1})$ and $O(m^{m} k^{m-t-1})$ vertices for the $\mathcal{H}$-Packing with $t$-Overlap and its edge version, respectively. In all cases, $k$ is the input parameter while $t$, $r$, and $m$ are constants.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Henning Fernau, Alejandro López-Ortiz, Jazmín Romero. 2014-11-25. Kernelization Algorithms for Packing Problems Allowing Overlaps (Extended Version). https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.6915

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS