Mathematical modeling of type 1 diabetes in the NOD mouse: separating incidence and age of onset

James R. Moore; Fred Adler

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1412.6566

Mathematical modeling of type 1 diabetes in the NOD mouse: separating incidence and age of onset

James R. Moore·Fred Adler

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease of the beta cells of the pancreas. The nonobese diabetic (NOD) mouse is a commonly used animal model, with roughly an 80% incidence rate of T1D among females. In 100% of NOD mice, macrophages and T-cells invade the islets in a process called insulitis. It can be several weeks between insulitis and T1D, and some mice do not progress at all. It is thought that this delay is mediated by regulatory T-cells (Tregs) and that a gradual loss of effectiveness in this population leads to T1D. However, this does not explain why some mice progress and others do not. We propose a simple mathematical model of the interaction between beta cells and the immune populations, including regulatory T-cells. We find that individual mice may enter one of two stable steady states: a `mild' insulitis state that does not progress to T1D and a `severe' insulitis state that does. We then run a sensitivity analysis to identify which parameters affect incidence of T1D versus those that affect age of onset. We also test the model by simulating several experimental manipulations found in the literature that modify insulitis severity and/or Treg activity. Notably, we are able to match a reproduce a large number of phenomena using a relatively small number of equations. We finish by proposing experiments that could help validate or refine the model.

Explore related subjects

q-bio.TO q-bio.QM

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

James R. Moore, Fred Adler. 2014-12-20. Mathematical modeling of type 1 diabetes in the NOD mouse: separating incidence and age of onset. https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6566

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Adaptive therapy under parametric, structural, and measurement uncertainty

Adaptive therapy has emerged as a promising treatment strategy that exploits within-tumour competition to delay disease progression. Implementation, however, typically relies on indirect measurements of tumour burden and must account for potentially substantial patient heterogeneity. In this work, we capture patient-to-patient variability, parameter uncertainty, and imperfect biomarker measurements with a mathematical and statistical model that we calibrate to clinical prostate cancer data using a Bayesian inference framework. We use the resulting virtual cohort to demonstrate that, within the simple but now well-established Lotka-Volterra-based model, adaptive therapy robustly improves time-to-progression for the subset of patients that are predicted to eventually progress by the model. To account for other risk factors associated with larger tumour volumes, we introduce a new metric based on the risk of metastasis that demonstrates how adaptive therapy may be disadvantageous when sustained tumour burden is also considered. Given the ubiquity of uncertainty in oncology, we then describe several future modelling directions that also capture uncertainty in the temporal evolution of the underlying tumour or biomarker dynamics. Finally, we demonstrate how model misspecification and non-identifiability can lead to unreliable predictions, especially if uncertainty is inadequately captured.

q-bio.TO↗

arXiv2026

Head Impact Characterization and Cellular Response of a Live-neuron cell-integrated Biomechanical Full-body Surrogate Model

In this study, we develop a novel integrated framework that links the impact response with cellular dynamics using a live-neuron cell-integrated biomechanical full-body surrogate model. The impact event is simulated by allowing the surrogate model to fall from controlled seated release angles of 30-degree, 60-degree, and 90-degree. Three vertically stacked cell-culture Petri dishes, each containing live SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells, were placed inside the head of a commercially available surrogate model. The dynamic response of the impact event was evaluated using acceleration measurements from six accelerometers, comprising three sensors mounted on the head surface and three embedded in series with the cell stacks, along with kinematic measurements of the fall and deformation of the head model. In parallel, an OpenSim-based modified musculoskeletal model was used to simulate the fall experiment. We found that variation in contact stiffness produced the largest change in the predicted head acceleration in the simulation. When the cellular response and the measured accelerations are compared, oxidative stress and cell viability showed trends consistent with the regional acceleration and angle of fall. At the 90-degree fall, where median peak linear accelerations ranged from 170-258g, and the maximum headform deformation was approximately 9.4 mm, oxidative stress increased to approximately twice that of the control sample. We also quantified the cellular drift of SH-SY5Y cells, which is focal in nature for the 90-degree impact condition. The corresponding fall scenarios were also simulated in OpenSim and a preliminary calibration relationship was developed to compare the kinematic responses of the physical surrogate and musculoskeletal model. Finally, the framework provides a basis for relating experimental surrogate measurements to human head-neck response during impact.

q-bio.TO↗

arXiv2026

History Matters: Damage-Mediated Amplification of Brain Deformation and Injury Risk under Repeated Head Impacts

Computational head models are typically applied to isolated impacts, leaving repeated head loading largely unexplored. An Ogden-Roxburgh Mullins damage formulation was implemented in a high-fidelity finite element head model to represent loading-history-dependent softening during cyclic brain-tissue deformation. Repeated-loading histories derived from mixed martial arts head-impact data were applied and compared with damage-free hyperelastic (HE) and linear visco-hyperelastic (LVHE) model variants. Under five identical single-axis cycles, Mullins-type softening progressively increased strain and strain rate metrics relative to the HE model. Mullins-based injury probabilities progressively exceeded strain-based HE predictions and diverged from unchanged kinematics-based predictions, indicating that neglecting prior softening may underestimate injury risk. In a randomized twenty-cycle multiaxial sequence, cycles of similar kinematic intensity produced different deformation and injury-risk estimates depending on prior softening. HE and LVHE models predicted higher injury probabilities initially, whereas the Mullins-based model produced the largest later-cycle estimates and highest probability of at least one injury over the sequence. Regional amplification depended on loading direction and prior softening, with no direction-independent trend among brain substructures. Gyral elements exhibited higher cumulative maximum principal strain than sulcal elements, which showed greater amplification relative to initial responses. These findings demonstrate that short-term damage-mediated softening can substantially amplify tissue deformation and injury-risk estimates beyond damage-free head models under the same loading histories. Further experimental characterization of cyclic brain-tissue softening is needed to improve models of repeated head loading and traumatic brain injury.

q-bio.TO↗