Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1501.06435

$F$-manifolds, multi-flat structures and Painlev\'e transcendents

Alessandro Arsie·Paolo Lorenzoni
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this paper we study $F$-manifolds equipped with multiple flat connections (and multiple $F$-products), that are required to be compatible in a suitable sense. In the semisimple case we show that a necessary condition for the existence of such multiple flat connections can be expressed in terms of the integrability of a distribution of vector fields that are related to the eventual identities for the multiple products involved. Using this fact we show that in general there can not be multi-flat structures with more than three flat connections. When the relevant distributions are integrable we construct bi-flat $F$-manifolds in dimension $2$ and $3$, and tri-flat $F$-manifolds in dimensions $3$ and $4$. In particular we obtain a parametrization of three-dimensional bi-flat $F$ in terms of a system of six first order ODEs that can be reduced to the full family of P$_{VI}$ equation and we construct non-trivial examples of four dimensional tri-flat $F$ manifolds that are controlled by hypergeometric functions. In the second part of the paper we extend our analysis to include non-semisimple multi-flat $F$-manifolds. We show that in dimension three, regular non-semisimple bi-flat $F$-manifolds are locally parameterized by solutions of the full P$_{IV}$ and P$_{V}$ equations, according to the Jordan normal form of the endomorphism $L=E\circ$. Combining this result with the local parametrization of $3$-dimensional bi-flat $F$-manifolds we have that confluences of P$_{IV}$, P$_{V}$ and P$_{VI}$ correspond to collisions of eigenvalues of $L$ preserving the regularity. Furthermore, we show that contrary to the semisimple situation, it is possible to construct regular non-semisimple multi-flat $F$-manifolds, with any number of compatible flat connections.

Explore related subjects

math-phmath.DGmath.MPnlin.SI

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Alessandro Arsie, Paolo Lorenzoni. 2015-01-26. $F$-manifolds, multi-flat structures and Painlev\'e transcendents. https://doi.org/10.4310/ajm.2019.v23.n5.a5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Why we should condition denoising diffusion generative models on windows of past observations

Data assimilation (DA) is, traditionally, a cycling process that relies on time-dependent priors to propagate information from past observations to future cycles. Using denoising diffusion generative modeling for DA is challenging because standard approaches use a fixed training data set, which in turn leads to a static prior that ignores information from past observations. Because past observations are ignored, DA systems with static priors lead to larger posterior errors than cycling DA systems. Incorporating time-dependent priors into generative models, however, requires expensive and frequent retraining. Motivated by linear systems theory - where the dependence of a prediction of a Kalman filter on past observations decays exponentially - we condition diffusion models on short windows of past observations. Specifically, we describe training procedures for two frameworks: a diffusion DA system predicting the current state given a set of past observations, and a diffusion ``direct observation prediction'' (DOP) system, predicting future observations given a set of past observations. Using a canonical linear system, we show that both systems can achieve the minimal posterior error characteristic of a fully-cycled DA/DOP system, without re-training, provided the time windows are long enough. The linear setup ensures analytical tractability, avoids confounding neural network training errors, and confirms that conditioning on windows of past observations is required for efficient and accurate diffusion-based DA or DOP.

math-ph↗
arXiv2026

The kinematic structures and the inertial geometry of a moving charge

We ask how much of the geometry a charged particle moves in is fixed by its motion, and how much a particle must bring. We ask of a symplectic structure only that it relate velocity to momentum as Hamilton's equations do, and we ask it of every energy at once. In particular, we show that the structures meeting that demand are the canonical one and its twists by a closed two-form of the base. A field provides the two-form, a particle the multiplier before it, which we identify constitutively with its charge. Thus, a single energy governs a family of structures, and each particle takes the one its charge fixes. We then ask what a particle must bring to be given a momentum, and we show that the degree of that map settles the degree at which a field enters Newton's Second Law. An antisymmetric bilinear form returns no Lorentz force, whilst a Randers metric returns one --- a length whose difference from a Riemannian one is linear in the velocity. Moreover, we find that metric already within the twisted structure, as its primitive over a level of the free energy, and its law of transport to be nonlinear, no affine connection being known to serve. Under an indefinite signature the length parts from the dynamics, and the extremals turn from shortest to longest. On the round sphere a monopole flux leaves no such metric, whilst the transport remains and prequantisation, given a unit of action, restricts the charge to a lattice. In this manner, we conclude that each charge-to-mass ratio receives a geometry of its own, so that by a functionalist criterion none of them is the spacetime of a charged particle.

math-ph↗