arXiv · 1501.06816
Why do mixed quantum-classical methods describe short-time dynamics through conical intersections so well? Analysis of geometric phase effects
Abstract
Adequate simulation of non-adiabatic dynamics through conical intersection requires account for a non-trivial geometric phase (GP) emerging in electronic and nuclear wave-functions in the adiabatic representation. Popular mixed quantum-classical (MQC) methods, surface hopping and Ehrenfest, do not carry a nuclear wave-function to be able to incorporate the GP into nuclear dynamics. Surprisingly, the MQC methods reproduce ultra-fast interstate crossing dynamics generated with the exact quantum propagation so well as if they contained information about the GP. Using two-dimensional linear vibronic coupling models we unravel how the MQC methods can effectively mimic the most significant dynamical GP effects: 1) compensation for repulsive diagonal second order non-adiabatic couplings and 2) transfer enhancement for a fully cylindrically symmetric component of a nuclear distribution.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Rami Gherib, Ilya G. Ryabinkin, Artur F. Izmaylov. 2015-03-03. Why do mixed quantum-classical methods describe short-time dynamics through conical intersections so well? Analysis of geometric phase effects. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00072
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.