SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1502.02481

Dynamic DFS Tree in Undirected Graphs: breaking the $O(m)$ barrier

Abstract

Depth first search (DFS) tree is a fundamental data structure for solving various problems in graphs. It is well known that it takes $O(m+n)$ time to build a DFS tree for a given undirected graph $G=(V,E)$ on $n$ vertices and $m$ edges. We address the problem of maintaining a DFS tree when the graph is undergoing {\em updates} (insertion and deletion of vertices or edges). We present the following results for this problem. (a) Fault tolerant DFS tree: There exists a data structure of size ${O}(m ~polylog~ n)$ such that given any set ${\cal F}$ of failed vertices or edges, a DFS tree of the graph $G\setminus {\cal F}$ can be reported in ${O}(n|{\cal F}| ~polylog~ n)$ time. (b) Fully dynamic DFS tree: There exists a fully dynamic algorithm for maintaining a DFS tree that takes worst case ${O}(\sqrt{mn} ~polylog~ n)$ time per update for any arbitrary online sequence of updates. (c) Incremental DFS tree: Given any arbitrary online sequence of edge insertions, we can maintain a DFS tree in ${O}(n ~polylog~ n)$ worst case time per edge insertion. These are the first $o(m)$ worst case time results for maintaining a DFS tree in a dynamic environment. Moreover, our fully dynamic algorithm provides, in a seamless manner, the first deterministic algorithm with $O(1)$ query time and $o(m)$ worst case update time for the dynamic subgraph connectivity, biconnectivity, and 2-edge connectivity.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Surender Baswana, Shreejit Ray Chaudhury, Keerti Choudhary, Shahbaz Khan. 2015-02-09. Dynamic DFS Tree in Undirected Graphs: breaking the $O(m)$ barrier. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611974331.ch52

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS