Quicksort, Largest Bucket, and Min-Wise Hashing with Limited Independence

Mathias Bæk Tejs Knudsen; Morten Stöckel

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1502.05729

Quicksort, Largest Bucket, and Min-Wise Hashing with Limited Independence

Mathias Bæk Tejs Knudsen·Morten Stöckel

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Randomized algorithms and data structures are often analyzed under the assumption of access to a perfect source of randomness. The most fundamental metric used to measure how "random" a hash function or a random number generator is, is its independence: a sequence of random variables is said to be $k$-independent if every variable is uniform and every size $k$ subset is independent. In this paper we consider three classic algorithms under limited independence. We provide new bounds for randomized quicksort, min-wise hashing and largest bucket size under limited independence. Our results can be summarized as follows. -Randomized quicksort. When pivot elements are computed using a $5$-independent hash function, Karloff and Raghavan, J.ACM'93 showed $O ( n \log n)$ expected worst-case running time for a special version of quicksort. We improve upon this, showing that the same running time is achieved with only $4$-independence. -Min-wise hashing. For a set $A$, consider the probability of a particular element being mapped to the smallest hash value. It is known that $5$-independence implies the optimal probability $O (1 /n)$. Broder et al., STOC'98 showed that $2$-independence implies it is $O(1 / \sqrt{|A|})$. We show a matching lower bound as well as new tight bounds for $3$- and $4$-independent hash functions. -Largest bucket. We consider the case where $n$ balls are distributed to $n$ buckets using a $k$-independent hash function and analyze the largest bucket size. Alon et. al, STOC'97 showed that there exists a $2$-independent hash function implying a bucket of size $\Omega ( n^{1/2})$. We generalize the bound, providing a $k$-independent family of functions that imply size $\Omega ( n^{1/k})$.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Mathias Bæk Tejs Knudsen, Morten Stöckel. 2015-02-19. Quicksort, Largest Bucket, and Min-Wise Hashing with Limited Independence. https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.05729

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗