SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1504.01459

A Complete Worst-Case Analysis of Heapsort with Experimental Verification of Its Results, A manuscript (MS)

Abstract

A rigorous proof is presented that the number of comparisons of keys performed in the worst case by ${\tt Heapsort}$ on any array of size $N \geq 2$ is equal to: $ 2 (N-1)\, ( \, \lg \frac{N-1}{2} +\varepsilon \, ) - 2s_2(N) - e_2(N) + \min (\lfloor \lg (N-1) \rfloor, 2) + 6 + c, $ where $ \varepsilon $, given by: $\varepsilon = 1 + \lceil \lg \, (N-1) \rceil - \lg \, (N-1) - 2^{\lceil \lg \, (N-1) \rceil - \lg \, (N-1)} ,$ is a function of $ N $ with the minimum value 0 and and the supremum value $\delta = 1 - \lg e + \lg \lg e \approx 0.0860713320559342$, $s_2(N)$ is the sum of all digits of the binary representation of $N$, $e_2(N)$ is the exponent of $2$ in the prime factorization of $N$, and $ c $ is a binary function on the set of integers defined by: $c = 1$, if $N \leq 2 ^{\lceil \lg N \rceil} - 4$, and $c = 0$, otherwise. An algorithm that generates worst-case input arrays of any size $ N \geq 2 $ for ${\tt Heapsort}$ is offered. The algorithm has been implemented in Java, runs in $O( N \log N )$ time, and allows for precise experimental verification of the above formula.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Marek A. Suchenek. 2015-04-07. A Complete Worst-Case Analysis of Heapsort with Experimental Verification of Its Results, A manuscript (MS). https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.01459

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS