SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1504.01785

Cardinalities of weakly Lindel\"of spaces with regular $G_\kappa$-diagonals

Abstract

For a Urysohn space $X$ we define the regular diagonal degree $\overline{\Delta}(X)$ of $X$ to be the minimal infinite cardinal $\kappa$ such that $X$ has a regular $G_\kappa$-diagonal i.e. there is a family $(U_\eta:\eta<\kappa)$ of open neighborhoods of $\Delta_X=\{(x,x)\in X^2:x\in X\}$ in $X^2$ such that $\Delta_X = \bigcap_{\eta<\kappa} \overline{U}_\eta$. In this paper we show that if $X$ is a Urysohn space then: (1) $|X|\leq 2^{c(X)\cdot\overline{\Delta}(X)}$; (2) $|X|\leq 2^{\overline{\Delta}(X)\cdot 2^{wL(X)}}$; (3) $|X|\le wL(X)^{\overline{\Delta}(X)\cdot\chi(X)}$; and (4) $|X|\le aL(X)^{\overline{\Delta}(X)}$; where $\chi(X)$, $c(X)$, $wL(X)$ and $aL(X)$ are respectively the character, the cellularity, the weak Lindel\"of number and the almost Lindel\"of number of $X$. The first inequality extends to the uncountable case Buzyakova's result that the cardinality of a ccc-space with a regular $G_\delta$-diagonal does not exceed $2^\omega$. It follows from (2) that every weakly Lindel\"of space with a regular $G_\delta$-diagonal has cardinality at most $2^{2^\omega}$. Inequality (3) implies that when $X$ is a space with a regular $G_\delta$-diagonal then $|X|\le wL(X)^{\chi(X)}$. This improves significantly Bell, Ginsburg and Woods inequality $|X|\le 2^{\chi(X)wL(X)}$ for the class of normal spaces with regular $G_\delta$-diagonals. In particular (3) shows that the cardinality of every first countable space with a regular $G_\delta$-diagonal does not exceed $wL(X)^\omega$. For the class of spaces with regular $G_\delta$-diagonals (4) improves Bella and Cammaroto inequality $|X|\le 2^{\chi(X)\cdot aL(X)}$, which is valid for all Urysohn spaces. Also, it follows from (4) that the cardinality of every space with a regular $G_\delta$-diagonal does not exceed $aL(X)^\omega$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ivan S. Gotchev. 2015-04-08. Cardinalities of weakly Lindel\"of spaces with regular $G_\kappa$-diagonals. https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.01785

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Maximal Center of Distances of Finite Ultrametric Spaces and Perfect Binary Trees

We investigate the finite ultrametric spaces $(X,d)$ that have a given cardinality of the center of distances and a minimal cardinality of the set $X$. It is shown that such spaces are isometric if and only if their centers of distances are the same. The representing trees of these spaces are characterized up to isomorphism.

math.GN

A continuous $3$-distributive frame that is not $\omega$-distributive

We give a negative answer to the question, posed by Ern\'e, whether every $3$-distributive lattice is $\omega$-distributive. More precisely, we exhibit a continuous frame that is $\kappa$-distributive for every integer $\kappa\geq 2$, but is not a wide coframe. The frame is the open-set lattice of a compact, locally compact, countably based $T_0$ topological meet-semilattice, obtained from Lawson's construction in the logarithmic form described by Goubault-Larrecq. The failure of $\omega$-distributivity is witnessed by an explicit matrix with countably many nonempty finite rows: all row joins are the same nonzero element, whereas every choice of one entry from each row has meet zero. The same space answers negatively Ern\'e's accompanying question whether every $4$-web space is a wide web space. All properties of the construction needed for these conclusions are proved directly.

math.GN

An overlooked weakening of perfect normality: Perfect regularity in spaces and locales

We introduce the notion of perfect regularity as an appropriate weakening of perfect normality, both for spaces and locales. Various characterizations are given, using Dedekind-MacNeille completions, injective hulls, and sublocales. We place the new class of perfectly regular frames among various well-studied classes of frames. We also introduce the construction of perfect regularization of a completely regular frame, compare it to Isbell's well-known booleanization construction, and argue that it is at least as important as the latter.

math.GN