Tight Bounds for Linear Sketches of Approximate Matchings

Sepehr Assadi; Sanjeev Khanna; Yang Li; Grigory Yaroslavtsev

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1505.01467

Tight Bounds for Linear Sketches of Approximate Matchings

Sepehr Assadi·Sanjeev Khanna·Yang Li·Grigory Yaroslavtsev

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We resolve the space complexity of linear sketches for approximating the maximum matching problem in dynamic graph streams where the stream may include both edge insertion and deletion. Specifically, we show that for any $\epsilon > 0$, there exists a one-pass streaming algorithm, which only maintains a linear sketch of size $\tilde{O}(n^{2-3\epsilon})$ bits and recovers an $n^\epsilon$-approximate maximum matching in dynamic graph streams, where $n$ is the number of vertices in the graph. In contrast to the extensively studied insertion-only model, to the best of our knowledge, no non-trivial single-pass streaming algorithms were previously known for approximating the maximum matching problem on general dynamic graph streams. Furthermore, we show that our upper bound is essentially tight. Namely, any linear sketch for approximating the maximum matching to within a factor of $O(n^\epsilon)$ has to be of size $n^{2-3\epsilon -o(1)}$ bits. We establish this lower bound by analyzing the corresponding simultaneous number-in-hand communication model, with a combinatorial construction based on Ruzsa-Szemer\'{e}di graphs.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Sepehr Assadi, Sanjeev Khanna, Yang Li, Grigory Yaroslavtsev. 2015-05-06. Tight Bounds for Linear Sketches of Approximate Matchings. https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.01467

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗