Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1505.04229

Container Relocation Problem: Approximation, Asymptotic, and Incomplete Information

Setareh Borjian·Virgile Galle·Vahideh H. Manshadi·Cynthia Barnhart·Patrick Jaillet
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Container Relocation Problem (CRP) is concerned with finding a sequence of moves of containers that minimizes the number of relocations needed to retrieve all containers respecting a given order of retrieval. While the problem is known to be NP-hard, certain algorithms such as the A* search and heuristics perform reasonably well on many instances of the problem. In this paper, we first focus on the A* search algorithm, and analyze lower and upper bounds that are easy to compute and can be used to prune nodes. Our analysis sheds light on which bounds result in fast computation within a given approximation gap. We present extensive simulation results that improve upon our theoretical analysis, and further show that our method finds the optimum solution on most instances of medium-size bays. On "hard" instances, our method finds an approximate solution with a small gap and within a time frame that is fast for practical applications. We also study the average-case asymptotic behavior of the CRP where the number of columns grows. We calculate the expected number of relocations in the limit, and show that the optimum number of relocations converges to a simple and intuitive lower-bound. We further study the CRP with incomplete information by relaxing the assumption that the order of retrieval of all containers are initially known. This assumption is particularly unrealistic in ports without an appointment system. We assume that the retrieval order of a subset of containers is known initially and the retrieval order of the remaining containers is observed later at a given specific time. Before this time, we assume a probabilistic distribution on the retrieval order of unknown containers. We combine the A* algorithm with sampling technique to solve this two-stage stochastic optimization problem. We show that our algorithm is fast and the error due to sampling and pruning is reasonably small.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Setareh Borjian, Virgile Galle, Vahideh H. Manshadi, Cynthia Barnhart, Patrick Jaillet. 2015-05-16. Container Relocation Problem: Approximation, Asymptotic, and Incomplete Information. https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.04229

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗