SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1506.04474

Optimal Online Algorithms for the Multi-Objective Time Series Search Problem

Abstract

Tiedemann, et al. [Proc. of WALCOM, LNCS 8973, 2015, pp.210-221] defined multi-objective online problems (as an online version of multi-objective optimization problems) and the competitive analysis for multi-objective online problems and showed that (1) with respect to the worst component competitive analysis, the online algorithm RPP-HIGH is best possible for the multi-objective time series search~problem; (2) with respect to the arithmetic mean component competitive analysis, the online algorithm RPP-MULT is best possible for the bi-objective time series search problem; (3) with respect to the geometric mean component competitive analysis, the online algorithm RPP-MULT is best possible for the bi-objective time series search problem. In this paper, we first point out that the definitions and frameworks of the competitive analysis due to Tiedemann, et al. do not necessarily capture the efficiency of online algorithms for multi-objective online problems and provide modified definitions of the competitive analysis for multi-objective online problems. Then under the modified framework, we present a simple online algorithm Balanced Price Policy BPP_{k} for the multi-objective (k-objective) time series search problem, and show that the algorithm BPP_{k} is best possible with respect to any measure of the competitive analysis (defined by a monotone continuous function f). Under the modified framework, we derive exact values of the competitive ratio for the multi-objective time series search problem with respect to the worst component competitive analysis, the arithmetic mean component competitive analysis, and the geometric mean component competitive analysis.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Shun Hasegawa, Toshiya Itoh. 2015-06-15. Optimal Online Algorithms for the Multi-Objective Time Series Search Problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.04474

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS