SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1506.08620

Fast and Vectorizable Alternative to Binary Search in O(1) Applicable to a Wide Domain of Sorted Arrays of Floating Point Numbers

Abstract

Given an array $X$ of $N+1$ strictly ordered floating point numbers and a floating point number $z$ in the interval $[X_0,X_N)$, a common problem is to find the index $i$ of the interval $[X_{i},X_{i+1})$ containing $z$. This problem arises for instance in the context of spline interpolation or the computation of empirical probability distribution from empirical data. Often it needs to be solved for a large number of different values $z$ and the same array $X$, which makes it worth investing resources upfront in pre-processing the array $X$ with the goal of speeding up subsequent search operations. In some cases the values $z$ to be processed are known simultaneously in blocks of size $M$, which offers the opportunity to solve the problem vectorially, exploiting the parallel capabilities of modern CPUs. The common solution is to sequentially invoke $M$ times the well known binary search algorithm, which has complexity $O(log_2 N)$ per individual search and, in its classic formulation, is not vectorizable, i.e. is not SIMD friendly. This paper describes technical improvements to the binary search algorithm, which make it faster and vectorizable. Next it proposes a new vectorizable algorithm, based on an indexing technique, applicable to a wide family of $X$ partitions, which solves the problem with complexity $O(1)$ per individual search at the cost of introducing an initial overhead to compute the index and requiring extra memory for its storage. Test results using streaming SIMD extensions compare the performance of the algorithm versus various benchmarks and demonstrate its effectiveness. Depending on the test case, the algorithm can produce a throughput up to two orders of magnitude larger than the classic binary search. Applicability limitations and cache-friendliness related aspects are also discussed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Fabio Cannizzo. 2015-06-29. Fast and Vectorizable Alternative to Binary Search in O(1) Applicable to a Wide Domain of Sorted Arrays of Floating Point Numbers. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2017.10.007

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS