SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1507.03407

Strategy Synthesis in Adversarial Patrolling Games

Abstract

Patrolling is one of the central problems in operational security. Formally, a patrolling problem is specified by a set $U$ of nodes (admissible defender's positions), a set $T \subseteq U$ of vulnerable targets, an admissible defender's moves over $U$, and a function which to every target assigns the time needed to complete an intrusion at it. The goal is to design an optimal strategy for a defender who is moving from node to node and aims at detecting possible intrusions at the targets. The goal of the attacker is to maximize the probability of a successful attack. We assume that the attacker is adversarial, i.e., he knows the strategy of the defender and can observe her moves. We prove that the defender has an optimal strategy for every patrolling problem. Further, we show that for every $\varepsilon$ > 0, there exists a finite-memory $\varepsilon$-optimal strategy for the defender constructible in exponential time, and we observe that such a strategy cannot be computed in polynomial time unless P=NP. Then we focus ourselves to unrestricted defender's moves. Here, a patrolling problem is fully determined by its signature, the number of targets of each attack length. We bound the maximal probability of successfully defended attacks. Then, we introduce a decomposition method which allows to split a given patrolling problem $G$ into smaller subproblems and construct a defender's strategy for $G$ by "composing" the strategies constructed for these subproblems. Finally, for patrolling problems with $T = U$ and a well-formed signature, we give an exact classification of all sufficiently connected environments where the defender can achieve the same value as in the fully connected uniform environment. This result is useful for designing "good" environments where the defender can act optimally.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Tomáš Brázdil, Petr Hliněný, Antonín Kučera, Vojtěch Řehák, Matúš Abaffy. 2015-07-13. Strategy Synthesis in Adversarial Patrolling Games. https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.03407

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT