Micro moon versus macro moon: Brightness and size

Dulli Chandra Agrawal

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1507.03578

Micro moon versus macro moon: Brightness and size

Dulli Chandra Agrawal

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The moon, moonlight, phases of the moon and its relatively simple recurring cycle has been of interest since time immemorial to the human beings, navigators, astronomers and astrologers. The fact that its orbit is elliptical as well its plane is inclined with the plane of rotation of the earth gives rise to new moon to full moon and solar and lunar eclipses. During the phase of the full moon, the luminous flux and its apparent size will depend on its distance from the earth. In case it is at farthest point known as lunar apogee causes smallest full moon or micro full moon and if it is closest to us termed as lunar perigee will result in macro full moon, also known as super moon, a term coined by astrologer Richard Nolle in 1979. The theoretical expressions for the lunar luminous fluxes on the earth representing the power of lunar light the earth intercepts in the direction normal to the incidence over an area of one square meter are derived for two extreme positions lunar apogee and lunar perigee. The expressions for the apparent sizes of full moons corresponding to said positions are also mentioned. It is found that full perigee moon is about 29 percent brighter and 14 percent bigger than the full apogee moon consistent with the reported values.

Explore related subjects

physics.pop-ph

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Dulli Chandra Agrawal. 2015-07-13. Micro moon versus macro moon: Brightness and size. https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.03578

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The Epistemic Risk of the 31st Spore: If Planets Aren't Fine Tuned, We're Doing Life Detection Wrong

Exploration of planetary bodies within our solar system will be essential for understanding the origin of life on Earth and the distribution of life in the universe. Planetary protection policy is concerned with balancing this desire for exploration against the risks of contaminating alien planets with Earth life, and contaminating Earth with alien life. However, at present, we have no fundamental scientific understanding of life's emergence or its nature beyond Earth. Given this nearly complete ignorance about the possibility of alien life, or Earth life's capacity to expand beyond our planet, it is difficult to reason about the real risks of space exploration. Here we contend that contemporary understandings of the risks of forward contamination are based on arguments which inconsistently apply our incomplete knowledge to the problem. We reason that a more assertive posture towards space exploration, focused on determining whether other planets in the solar system are inhabited, is warranted and explain why such a posture may not increase the epistemic risks of planetary contamination. Finally, we explore the consequences of our arguments for planetary protection protocols, and life detection efforts.

physics.pop-ph↗

arXiv2026

Project Setu: 3D Multi-Physics Design and Scaled Structural Analysis for a Relativistic Lightsail Architecture

Deep-space exploration beyond the solar system requires eliminating chemical propellant mass penalties to achieve relativistic flight velocities (0.166c at 180 s, reaching the mission target of 0.20c at 227 s). This study presents a 3D multi-physics numerical framework for a 4.0-meter circular lightsail propelled by a 100 GW ground laser array, coupling 3D Maxwell FDTD wave optics, non-linear membrane mechanics, and Stefan-Boltzmann thermal radiation in ANSYS Mechanical APDL and Ansys Lumerical. A four-level grid convergence study establishes numerical independence with an ASME GCI_21 of 0.13%, resolving peak membrane stresses of 530.88 MPa with a 3.77x safety factor against stoichiometric Si3N4 tensile failure. With optical absorption constrained to 10 ppm (A = 1.0 x 10^-5), the steady-state core temperature stabilizes at 923.02 K (0.44% deviation from radiation theory), maintaining a +1,247 K margin below sublimation, while fundamental drumhead modal resonance (7.92 Hz) provides a 7.92x safety buffer against laser jitter. The electrodynamic radiation pressure formulation is cross-verified against published flight telemetry from JAXA IKAROS and NASA LightSail 2 within 0.12% and 2.13%, confirming classical momentum transfer modeling across solar and beamed propulsion regimes.

physics.pop-ph↗

arXiv2026

"It's getting away from us!" - Black Hole Horizons and Relative Speed

Black holes hold considerable fascination for the general public and students alike, and are commonly included in general-science courses on astronomy or modern physics. But teaching about the basics of black holes poses a considerable challenge: Any rigorous description requires concepts and techniques from general relativity, Einstein's theory of geometry and gravitation. And any half-way rigorous introduction to that theory, including the required mathematical tools, is significantly beyond the level of general-science courses. Inevitably, accounts of relativistic physics at the introductory undergraduate level make use of analogies, approximations and simplified models to teach about topics like black holes, gravitational waves, gravitational lensing, or cosmology. The purpose of this article is to given an account of one particular set of analogies for teaching about black holes, all of which are based on modelling the motions of observers in the vicinity of the black hole and rely on the concept of (relative) speed to describe properties of the black hole. While most elements of what I am about to describe can be found in the existing literature, I am not aware of any text that attempts to pull them together into a unified picture at a suitable level of presentation for undergraduate-level teaching; that is the goal of the present text.

physics.pop-ph↗