Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1507.08738

Variable Annuity with GMWB: surrender or not, that is the question

Xiaolin Luo·Pavel Shevchenko
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Under the optimal withdrawal strategy of a policyholder, the pricing of variable annuities with Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal Benefit (GMWB) is an optimal stochastic control problem. The surrender feature available in marketed products allows termination of the contract before maturity, making it also an optimal stopping problem. Although the surrender feature is quite common in variable annuity contracts, there appears to be no published analysis and results for this feature in GMWB under optimal policyholder behaviour - results found in the literature so far are consistent with the absence of such a feature. Also, it is of practical interest to see how the much simpler bang-bang strategy, although not optimal for GMWB, compares with optimal GMWB strategy with surrender option. In this paper we extend our recently developed algorithm (Luo and Shevchenko 2015a) to include surrender option in GMWB and compare prices under different policyholder strategies: optimal, static and bang-bang. Results indicate that following a simple but sub-optimal bang-bang strategy does not lead to significant reduction in the price or equivalently in the fee, in comparison with the optimal strategy. We observed that the extra value added by the surrender option could add very significant value to the GMWB contract. We also performed calculations for static withdrawal with surrender option, which is the same as bang-bang minus the "no-withdrawal" choice. We find that the fee for such contract is only less than 1% smaller when compared to the case of bang-bang strategy, meaning that th "no-withdrawal" option adds little value to the contract.

Explore related subjects

q-fin.PR

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Xiaolin Luo, Pavel Shevchenko. 2015-07-31. Variable Annuity with GMWB: surrender or not, that is the question. https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.08738

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Pricing and Hedging of Discretely Monitored Asian Options in the Volterra-Heston Model

We develop semi-closed pricing formulas and lifted-model hedging methods for discretely monitored geometric and arithmetic Asian options in the Volterra-Heston stochastic volatility model. Exploiting the affine Volterra structure, we derive a tractable transform for the joint law of the terminal log-price and the discretely monitored geometric average. This transform yields semi-closed pricing formulas for geometric Asian options, which in turn provide effective control variates for Monte Carlo valuation of arithmetic Asian options. Under the stated real-moment and affine-transform hypotheses, we also derive the Galtchouk-Kunita-Watanabe decomposition for Fourier-representable payoffs and obtain a variance-optimal hedge in terms of the Riccati-Volterra equation and the forward-variance curve. Using N-factor Markovian approximations, we obtain a finite-dimensional numerical implementation for hedging Asian options. Our numerical experiments document factor convergence for a regular non-Markovian kernel and the effect of rebalancing frequency on hedging error. In the Heston benchmark, geometric Asian controls substantially reduce the variance of arithmetic-Asian price estimates and improve the finite-sample stability of regression-based hedging relative to direct regression.

q-fin.PR↗
arXiv2026

Beyond Lognormal Sums: A Four-Moment Probability Framework for Basket and Spread Option Pricing

Basket options are difficult to value under correlated lognormal dynamics because weighted sums and differences of lognormal variables have no tractable distribution. This paper develops a probability-based four-moment framework that separates the exact pricing representation from the distributional approximation. A change of measure first writes a basket price as a linear combination of probabilities. For a standard basket with one positive weight, these probabilities become CDF values of positive correlated lognormal sums. Each sum is approximated by a shifted lognormal variance mixture matched to its first four moments. For an unrestricted mixed-sign basket, a signed shifted lognormal proxy gives an analytical call-price formula. We state admissibility conditions, provide a practical root-selection rule, establish the main strike-based financial properties of the direct proxy, and derive exact pricing-error identities in terms of cumulative distribution function (CDF) discrepancies. The numerical analysis combines standard-basket benchmarks with an empirical application to a normalized $3{:}2{:}1$ crack spread constructed from RBOB gasoline, ULSD or heating oil, and WTI futures. The results show that the probability reformulation and the fourth-moment condition improve the distributional fit and pricing accuracy, particularly when maturity and tail asymmetry increase. The framework remains analytical, transparent, and suitable for repeated valuation across strikes and maturities.

q-fin.PR↗
arXiv2026

When to Sell an Asset? - A Distribution Builder Approach

We consider the question of the optimal timing of the sale of an asset with stochastic dynamics. Our analysis is based on the method of the distribution builder introduced by Sharpe, Goldstein and Blythe [SGB00] for the purpose of optimal portfolio selection. Instead of specifying a utility function or risk aversion coefficient, this tool directly elicits the target distribution of the investor. We show how the problem of an optimal asset sale is in this setting linked to the problem of finding a Skorokhod embedding of a distribution into a diffusion process. In the case where the asset process follows a geometric Brownian motion and a specific family of distributions is targeted, one can observe a risk-return tradeoff.

q-fin.PR↗