SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1508.00690

Non-commutative Edmonds' problem and matrix semi-invariants

Abstract

In 1967, Edmonds introduced the problem of computing the rank over the rational function field of an $n\times n$ matrix $T$ with integral homogeneous linear polynomials. In this paper, we consider the non-commutative version of Edmonds' problem: compute the rank of $T$ over the free skew field. It is known that this problem relates to the ring of matrix semi-invariants. In particular, if the nullcone of matrix semi-invariants is defined by elements of degree $\leq \sigma$, then there follows a $\mathrm{poly}(n, \sigma)$-time randomized algorithm to decide whether the non-commutative rank of $T$ is $<n$. To our knowledge, previously the best bound for $\sigma$ was $O(n^2\cdot 4^{n^2})$ over algebraically closed fields of characteristic $0$ (Derksen, 2001). In this article we prove the following results: (1) We observe that by using an algorithm of Gurvits, and assuming the above bound $\sigma$ for $R(n, m)$ over $\mathbb{Q}$, deciding whether $T$ has non-commutative rank $<n$ over $\mathbb{Q}$ can be done deterministically in time polynomial in the input size and $\sigma$. (2) When $\mathbb{F}$ is large enough, we devise a deterministic algorithm for non-commutative Edmonds' problem in time polynomial in $(n+1)!$, with the following consequences. (2.a) If the commutative rank and the non-commutative rank of $T$ differ by a constant, then there exists a randomized efficient algorithm that computes the non-commutative rank of $T$. (2.b) We prove that $\sigma\leq (n+1)!$. This not only improves the bound obtained from Derksen's work over algebraically closed field of characteristic $0$ but, more importantly, also provides for the first time an explicit bound on $\sigma$ for matrix semi-invariants over fields of positive characteristics.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Gábor Ivanyos, Youming Qiao, K. V. Subrahmanyam. 2015-08-04. Non-commutative Edmonds' problem and matrix semi-invariants. https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.00690

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS