Practical Algorithms for Finding Extremal Sets

Martin Marinov; Nicholas Nash; David Gregg

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1508.01753

Practical Algorithms for Finding Extremal Sets

Martin Marinov·Nicholas Nash·David Gregg

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The minimal sets within a collection of sets are defined as the ones which do not have a proper subset within the collection, and the maximal sets are the ones which do not have a proper superset within the collection. Identifying extremal sets is a fundamental problem with a wide-range of applications in SAT solvers, data-mining and social network analysis. In this paper, we present two novel improvements of the high-quality extremal set identification algorithm, \textit{AMS-Lex}, described by Bayardo and Panda. The first technique uses memoization to improve the execution time of the single-threaded variant of the AMS-Lex, whilst our second improvement uses parallel programming methods. In a subset of the presented experiments our memoized algorithm executes more than $400$ times faster than the highly efficient publicly available implementation of AMS-Lex. Moreover, we show that our modified algorithm's speedup is not bounded above by a constant and that it increases as the length of the common prefixes in successive input \textit{itemsets} increases. We provide experimental results using both real-world and synthetic data sets, and show our multi-threaded variant algorithm out-performing AMS-Lex by $3$ to $6$ times. We find that on synthetic input datasets when executed using $16$ CPU cores of a $32$-core machine, our multi-threaded program executes about as fast as the state of the art parallel GPU-based program using an NVIDIA GTX 580 graphics processing unit.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Martin Marinov, Nicholas Nash, David Gregg. 2015-08-07. Practical Algorithms for Finding Extremal Sets. https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.01753

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗