SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1508.06542

The M&M Game: From Morsels to Modern Mathematics

Abstract

To an adult, it's obvious that the day of someone's death is not precisely determined by the day of birth, but it's a very different story for a child. When the third named author was four years old he asked his father, the fifth named author: If two people are born on the same day, do they die on the same day? While this could easily be demonstrated through murder, such a proof would greatly diminish the possibility of teaching additional lessons, and thus a different approach was taken. With the help of the fourth named author they invented what we'll call \emph{the M\&M Game}: Given $k$ people, each simultaneously flips a fair coin, with each eating an M\&M on a head and not eating on a tail. The process then continues until all \mandms\ are consumed, and two people are deemed to die at the same time if they run out of \mandms\ together\footnote{Is one really living without \mandms?}. This led to a great concrete demonstration of randomness appropriate for little kids; it also led to a host of math problems which have been used in probability classes and math competitions. There are many ways to determine the probability of a tie, which allow us in this article to use this problem as a springboard to a lot of great mathematics, including memoryless process, combinatorics, statistical inference, graph theory, and hypergeometric functions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ivan Badinski, Christopher Huffaker, Nathan McCue, Cameron N. Miller, Kayla S. Miller, Steven J. Miller, Michael Stone. 2015-08-24. The M&M Game: From Morsels to Modern Mathematics. https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.06542

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO