SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1509.07680

Connectivity Preserving Iterative Compaction and Finding 2 Disjoint Rooted Paths in Linear Time

Abstract

In this paper we show how to combine two algorithmic techniques to obtain linear time algorithms for various optimization problems on graphs, and present a subroutine which will be useful in doing so. The first technique is iterative shrinking. In the first phase of an iterative shrinking algorithm, we construct a sequence of graphs of decreasing size $G_1,\ldots,G_\ell$ where $G_1$ is the initial input, $G_\ell$ is a graph on which the problem is easy, and $G_i$ is obtained from $G_{i+1}$ via some shrinking algorithm. In the second phase we work through the sequence in reverse, repeatedly constructing a solution for a graph from the solution for its successor. In an iterative compaction algorithm, we insist that the graphs decrease by a constant fraction of the entire graph. Another approach to solving optimization problems is to exploit the structural properties implied by the connectivity of the input graph. This approach can be used on graphs which are not highly connected by decomposing an input graph into its highly connected pieces, solving subproblems on these specially structured pieces and then combining their solutions. We combine these two techniques by developing compaction algorithms which when applied to the highly connected pieces preserve their connectivity properties. The structural properties this connectivity implies can be helpful both in finding further compactions in later iterations and when we are manipulating solutions in the second phase of an iterative compaction algorithm. To illustrate how this compaction algorithm can be used as a subroutine, we present a linear time algorithm that given four vertices $\{s_1,s_2,t_1,t_2\}$ of a graph $G$, either finds a pair of disjoint paths $P_1$ and $P_2$ of $G$ such that $P_i$ has endpoints $s_i$ and $t_i$, or returns a planar embedding of an auxiliary graph which shows that no such pair exists.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ken-ichi Kawarabayashi, Zhentao Li, Bruce Reed. 2015-09-25. Connectivity Preserving Iterative Compaction and Finding 2 Disjoint Rooted Paths in Linear Time. https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.07680

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS