Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1510.05495

Canine Olfactory Differentiation of Cancer: A Review of the Literature

Oliver Gould·Amy Smart·Norman Ratcliffe·Ben de Lacy Costello
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Numerous studies have attempted to demonstrate the olfactory ability of canines to detect several common cancer types from human bodily fluids, breath and tissue. Canines have been reported to detect bladder cancer (sensitivity of 0.63-0.73 and specificity of 0.64-0.92) and prostate cancer (sensitivity of 0.91-0.99 and specificity of 0.91-0.97) from urine; breast cancer (sensitivity of 0.88 and specificity of 0.98) and lung cancer (sensitivity 0.56-0.99 and specificity of 8.30-0.99) on breath and colorectal cancer from stools (sensitivity of 0.91-0.97 and specificity of 0.97-0.99). The quoted figures of sensitivity and specificity across differing studies demonstrate that in many cases results are variable from study to study; this raises questions about the reproducibility of methodology and study design which we have identified herein. Furthermore in some studies the controls used have resulted in differentiation of samples which are of limited use for clinical diagnosis. These studies provide some evidence that cancer gives rise to different volatile organic compounds (VOCs) compared to healthy samples. Whilst canine detection may be unsuitable for clinical implementation they can, at least, provide inspiration for more traditional laboratory investigations.

Explore related subjects

q-bio.TO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Oliver Gould, Amy Smart, Norman Ratcliffe, Ben de Lacy Costello. 2015-10-05. Canine Olfactory Differentiation of Cancer: A Review of the Literature. https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.05495

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Adaptive therapy under parametric, structural, and measurement uncertainty

Adaptive therapy has emerged as a promising treatment strategy that exploits within-tumour competition to delay disease progression. Implementation, however, typically relies on indirect measurements of tumour burden and must account for potentially substantial patient heterogeneity. In this work, we capture patient-to-patient variability, parameter uncertainty, and imperfect biomarker measurements with a mathematical and statistical model that we calibrate to clinical prostate cancer data using a Bayesian inference framework. We use the resulting virtual cohort to demonstrate that, within the simple but now well-established Lotka-Volterra-based model, adaptive therapy robustly improves time-to-progression for the subset of patients that are predicted to eventually progress by the model. To account for other risk factors associated with larger tumour volumes, we introduce a new metric based on the risk of metastasis that demonstrates how adaptive therapy may be disadvantageous when sustained tumour burden is also considered. Given the ubiquity of uncertainty in oncology, we then describe several future modelling directions that also capture uncertainty in the temporal evolution of the underlying tumour or biomarker dynamics. Finally, we demonstrate how model misspecification and non-identifiability can lead to unreliable predictions, especially if uncertainty is inadequately captured.

q-bio.TO↗
arXiv2026

Head Impact Characterization and Cellular Response of a Live-neuron cell-integrated Biomechanical Full-body Surrogate Model

In this study, we develop a novel integrated framework that links the impact response with cellular dynamics using a live-neuron cell-integrated biomechanical full-body surrogate model. The impact event is simulated by allowing the surrogate model to fall from controlled seated release angles of 30-degree, 60-degree, and 90-degree. Three vertically stacked cell-culture Petri dishes, each containing live SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells, were placed inside the head of a commercially available surrogate model. The dynamic response of the impact event was evaluated using acceleration measurements from six accelerometers, comprising three sensors mounted on the head surface and three embedded in series with the cell stacks, along with kinematic measurements of the fall and deformation of the head model. In parallel, an OpenSim-based modified musculoskeletal model was used to simulate the fall experiment. We found that variation in contact stiffness produced the largest change in the predicted head acceleration in the simulation. When the cellular response and the measured accelerations are compared, oxidative stress and cell viability showed trends consistent with the regional acceleration and angle of fall. At the 90-degree fall, where median peak linear accelerations ranged from 170-258g, and the maximum headform deformation was approximately 9.4 mm, oxidative stress increased to approximately twice that of the control sample. We also quantified the cellular drift of SH-SY5Y cells, which is focal in nature for the 90-degree impact condition. The corresponding fall scenarios were also simulated in OpenSim and a preliminary calibration relationship was developed to compare the kinematic responses of the physical surrogate and musculoskeletal model. Finally, the framework provides a basis for relating experimental surrogate measurements to human head-neck response during impact.

q-bio.TO↗
arXiv2026

History Matters: Damage-Mediated Amplification of Brain Deformation and Injury Risk under Repeated Head Impacts

Computational head models are typically applied to isolated impacts, leaving repeated head loading largely unexplored. An Ogden-Roxburgh Mullins damage formulation was implemented in a high-fidelity finite element head model to represent loading-history-dependent softening during cyclic brain-tissue deformation. Repeated-loading histories derived from mixed martial arts head-impact data were applied and compared with damage-free hyperelastic (HE) and linear visco-hyperelastic (LVHE) model variants. Under five identical single-axis cycles, Mullins-type softening progressively increased strain and strain rate metrics relative to the HE model. Mullins-based injury probabilities progressively exceeded strain-based HE predictions and diverged from unchanged kinematics-based predictions, indicating that neglecting prior softening may underestimate injury risk. In a randomized twenty-cycle multiaxial sequence, cycles of similar kinematic intensity produced different deformation and injury-risk estimates depending on prior softening. HE and LVHE models predicted higher injury probabilities initially, whereas the Mullins-based model produced the largest later-cycle estimates and highest probability of at least one injury over the sequence. Regional amplification depended on loading direction and prior softening, with no direction-independent trend among brain substructures. Gyral elements exhibited higher cumulative maximum principal strain than sulcal elements, which showed greater amplification relative to initial responses. These findings demonstrate that short-term damage-mediated softening can substantially amplify tissue deformation and injury-risk estimates beyond damage-free head models under the same loading histories. Further experimental characterization of cyclic brain-tissue softening is needed to improve models of repeated head loading and traumatic brain injury.

q-bio.TO↗