A faster FPT Algorithm and a smaller Kernel for Block Graph Vertex Deletion

Akanksha Agrawal; Sudeshna Kolay; Daniel Lokshtanov; Saket Saurabh

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1510.08154

A faster FPT Algorithm and a smaller Kernel for Block Graph Vertex Deletion

Akanksha Agrawal·Sudeshna Kolay·Daniel Lokshtanov·Saket Saurabh

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A graph $G$ is called a \emph{block graph} if each maximal $2$-connected component of $G$ is a clique. In this paper we study the Block Graph Vertex Deletion from the perspective of fixed parameter tractable (FPT) and kernelization algorithm. In particular, an input to Block Graph Vertex Deletion consists of a graph $G$ and a positive integer $k$ and the objective to check whether there exists a subset $S \subseteq V(G)$ of size at most $k$ such that the graph induced on $V(G)\setminus S$ is a block graph. In this paper we give an FPT algorithm with running time $4^kn^{O(1)}$ and a polynomial kernel of size $O(k^4)$ for Block Graph Vertex Deletion. The running time of our FPT algorithm improves over the previous best algorithm for the problem that ran in time $10^kn^{O(1)}$ and the size of our kernel reduces over the previously known kernel of size $O(k^9)$. Our results are based on a novel connection between Block Graph Vertex Deletion and the classical {\sc Feedback Vertex Set} problem in graphs without induced $C_4$ and $K_4-e$. To achieve our results we also obtain an algorithm for {\sc Weighted Feedback Vertex Set} running in time $3.618^kn^{O(1)}$ and improving over the running time of previously known algorithm with running time $5^kn^{O(1)}$.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Akanksha Agrawal, Sudeshna Kolay, Daniel Lokshtanov, Saket Saurabh. 2015-10-28. A faster FPT Algorithm and a smaller Kernel for Block Graph Vertex Deletion. https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.08154

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗