Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1511.00021

Narrow Gauge and Analytical Branching Strategies for Mixed Integer Programming

Fred Glover·Vladimir Shylo·Oleg Shylo
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

State-of-the-art branch and bound algorithms for mixed integer programming make use of special methods for making branching decisions. Strategies that have gained prominence include modern variants of so-called strong branching (Applegate, et al.,1995) and reliability branching (Achterberg, Koch and Martin, 2005; Hendel, 2015), which select variables for branching by solving associated linear programs and exploit pseudo-costs (Benichou et al., 1971). We suggest new branching criteria and propose alternative branching approaches called narrow gauge and analytical branching. The perspective underlying our approaches is to focus on prioritization of child nodes to examine fewer candidate variables at the current node of the B&B tree, balanced with procedures to extrapolate the implications of choosing these candidates by generating a small-depth look-ahead tree. Our procedures can also be used in rules to select among open tree nodes (those whose child nodes have not yet been generated). We incorporate pre- and post-winnowing procedures to progressively isolate preferred branching candidates, and employ derivative (created) variables whose branches are able to explore the solution space more deeply.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Fred Glover, Vladimir Shylo, Oleg Shylo. 2016-01-07. Narrow Gauge and Analytical Branching Strategies for Mixed Integer Programming. https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.00021

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗