SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1511.03186

Accelerated Newton Iteration: Roots of Black Box Polynomials and Matrix Eigenvalues

Abstract

We study the problem of computing the largest root of a real rooted polynomial $p(x)$ to within error $\varepsilon $ given only black box access to it, i.e., for any $x \in {\mathbb R}$, the algorithm can query an oracle for the value of $p(x)$, but the algorithm is not allowed access to the coefficients of $p(x)$. A folklore result for this problem is that the largest root of a polynomial can be computed in $O(n \log (1/\varepsilon ))$ polynomial queries using the Newton iteration. We give a simple algorithm that queries the oracle at only $O(\log n \log(1/\varepsilon ))$ points, where $n$ is the degree of the polynomial. Our algorithm is based on a novel approach for accelerating the Newton method by using higher derivatives. As a special case, we consider the problem of computing the top eigenvalue of a symmetric matrix in ${\mathbb Q}^{n \times n}$ to within error $\varepsilon $ in time polynomial in the input description, i.e., the number of bits to describe the matrix and $\log(1/\varepsilon )$. Well-known methods such as the power iteration and Lanczos iteration incur running time polynomial in $1/\varepsilon $, while Gaussian elimination takes $Ω(n^4)$ bit operations. As a corollary of our main result, we obtain a $\tilde{O}(n^ω \log^2 ( ||A||_F/\varepsilon ))$ bit complexity algorithm to compute the top eigenvalue of the matrix $A$ or to check if it is approximately PSD ($A \succeq -\varepsilon I$).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Anand Louis, Santosh S. Vempala. 2016-01-03. Accelerated Newton Iteration: Roots of Black Box Polynomials and Matrix Eigenvalues. https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.03186

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS